petereanima
Br00tal Bubbly Mofo
- what does the dry/wet dichotomy mean?
dry = without effects, amp signal only
wet = with effects in the chain/loop
- what does the dry/wet dichotomy mean?
dry = without effects, amp signal only
wet = with effects in the chain/loop
I mean, it still doesn't make sense to me why would someone deliberately choose not to use fx with the mesas.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Oooh I guess that solves my other questions, too. The signals from the Mesas are always dry, while the fx come from the one that comes from the Roland. Is that it...? I mean, it still doesn't make sense to me why would someone deliberately choose not to use fx with the mesas.
I know you're not sure about this stuff, but would it be possible, under this scheme, to use the G-Force with the Mesas? I mean, is there a reason for the G-Force not to be located before the signal splits (before the JD7)?
What the fuck...(in response to Jack White's copper plated shit).
Why the fuck would one bother with that?
"I'm going out on tour....hmmm.....I've boughten all the flashy 60's pants I could find....and all the shirts with the gay little tassles on the pockets....what's next? Oh, that's right, I need to have all my pedals re-made with copper housing. Yeah...almost forgot that one..."
why copper plate pedal cases???
just for looks?
i dont know if im more angry than i am confused...
i paint my rifles with KrylonThis is indeed a cool page... in concept, however information is spotty, hard to navigate, and well... in French. As complete as it looks there are some better pedalboard/rig theads out there.
Mesa Boogie Custom Design Gallery
^
I reiterate, customizing your shit is not stupid. If you think so, I'll be glad to spray your guitar down with some flat black Krylon.
Here's a surprisingly simple setup, especially considering the tasty tones emitted by said guitarist/songwriter virtuoso. Mikael is a self-admitted fan of simplicity (and begrudgingly embraces modern computer recording technology), and yet, as time has gone on, Opeth has migrated more towards self recording and production, they sound increasingly stellar ('Watershed', IMHO, was probably the best produced album of 2008). Proof that good tone in in the ear as much as the gear (or the fingers).
This is actually what they used to track the albums, coming straight from Jens Bogren:
"On Watershed i used the Marshall JVM together with the Mesa cab for the main rhythms. The secondary pair is Mesa Dual Rectifier through the MF400. SM57 and Royer on the main pair, 2x SM57 and one SM58 on the secondary pair (if my memory serves me)."
"On Ghost Reveries i used the MF400 for the main rythms. To be honest i can't remember what amps we used, i know it was one Mesa double Rectifier, but i must get back and... Oh no!!! Never ment to give this away, but the secondary pair was actually a POD XT with the (at the time new) Metal Pack! I see a shit storm coming this way. I remember now that i did regret it in the mix, and it's mostly the Mesa you will hear. I can see that some people are not impressed by the drum sound on that album, and to be honest i don't like it either. It was a compromise (my will against what the band thought they wanted), and on top of that pretty poor mastering."
The live rig hasn't been used for tracking guitars on their albums.