Search results

Good news, though. Awesome for cigar boxes!

I can't seem to see the picture. Is it one of those two-tone stain/coloured grain-fill finishes?

Felt, nylon strap, and velcro?

They pretty much send a sheet with specs to the factory. If you ask for pictures, you can pretty much say, "That's not the guitar I asked for," and the rational sellers will have it fixed before they send it.

Wow. It's honestly horrifying how many of you agree that the science is wrong.

I'm trying to be rational, but it's like trying to convince a five year old that the news isn't evidence that Santa Clause isn't real. It's terrifying how much misinformation is being spread while the media pushes everything else under the rug. Explorer, I get that you have a vested interest...

Even your own listed source (why you listed two points from the same source and believed them to be true simply because they agreed with each other, I'll never know) agrees that we have no certain ideas about what clouds do to heating (although none of the predictions by people claiming the...

You're both right. There used to be a passion in the North America and Europe to put out the best product possible. Now the only passion they seem to have is the premium they can get for stamping "Made In" on everything they make.

What do YOU think a strawman is? Never once did I say he didn't kill Trayvon Martin. I did, however state that he wasn't racially motivated, and was within his right of self defence to do so. How hard is it to grasp?

Another fallacy. This time, a Red Herring, good choice, sir!

Another straw man argument. What is it with people here. I'm not arguing that he killed Trayvon Martin, I'm arguing the belief that it was racially motivated. There's no way anyone can prove that, but people still seem to believe it.

It's just climate change. :P It's neither inherently bad, or good. It just is. Haha.

Straw man argument. Don't come at me with any more logical fallacies, or I'll go through all of your posts and list them one by one.

There is no consensus, a point I already alluded to. The numbers were skewered to falsify a point. In fact, the majority of climate scientists are skeptics. I also stated exactly what evidence it would take for me to concede my point. EDIT: And why are we arguing how many people think one way...

This is funny now. It's pretty common knowledge that CO2 isn't what's believed to be the actual problem. The climate models predict that the real problem is CO2 driving a heating system that evaporates water (water vapour is, by definition, a greenhouse gas) and heats up the earth more...

Show me actual evidence that water vapour warms up the atmosphere to the extent that it produces more water vapour and heats up the earth, exponentially increasing the greenhouse effect and dooming us all. Don't show me a climate model, show me evidence. Then, will I believe you.

There is no consensus. That's what you don't seem to get. There's no "over 90%" either. Dr. Roy Spencer, the head scientist on the instrumentation used to measure global atmospheric temperature (the stuff that matters) found one of his papers, which claimed CO2 is a greenhouse gas (a scientific...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oN_oynx1D8w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=potLQR7-_Tg

I honestly welcome you all to research it. I hate seeing politics get in the way of science.