Search results

I'm playing a show on April 26th, and I'd like to ideally play with my Pod HD 500, because I don't really have any other amp besides a small practice amp. I could try to borrow an amp, but I really do quite like the tones/effects I've gotten on my Pod HD. I believe I can plug directly into the...

I was actually thinking about that, if that's even noticeable.. :spock: But the purpleheart on the first one is absolutely fantastic. Fucking amazing looking.

I'll never understand how they get such a razor sharp, perfectly tight tone. I guess it's all in the fact that their guitarists are absolute monsters.

Goddamn, kudos on the cover/mix, so much more the fact that I never thought I'd hear someone cover a Within The Ruins song so well. My only complaint is that maybe your tone isn't as tight as theirs? It seems too loose, almost, whereas their tone is just very tight, very focused. Either way...

PM sent.

Excellent tone! Is there any way you could possibly share the tone? Only thing that it could use would be maybe some extra low-end, the bass seems lacking a little bit. Is there bass on the recording?

sweet, thanks a lot for the quick answer!

quick question guys. i got a pod hd 500 in order to replace my old amp (line 6 spider II, yeah, it's oooold), and to hook up to my computer easier. now, i'm using my computer speakers, which is a simple 2.1 set, not bad at all, but it's annoying since the subwoofer blasts bass to hell, so most...

why don't you just build the computer yourself? you could easily shave off over 500 dollars on that, easily more. also, with the ease that newer parts provide, assembling your own computer is incredibly fast/easy.

i just got my pod hd 500, and i'm loving it so far, i'm not even coming close to things to run out of tweaking. i have noticed though, that it sounds somewhat different, due to the fact that i'm playing it through my computer speakers, which are quite different than playing through normal...

Chimp Spanner | Store that would be a good place to start, the entire album is absolutely fantastic.

why don't you just use this video? it's clear the shape he uses for the clean part doesn't change, he just moves his hand down the neck.

also, i just realized this, when i'm tweaking a patch or whatnot, can't i add the boost pedal in the digital chain with podfarm? my friend has an older pod, and that's what i remember doing to tighten it up. i'm not really going to use this to play live, only to record, and play by myself on, so...

the only problem is i don't know if i can spring for the $500, does the hd 400 model have the same problem?

hey guys, just to put this in order, this isn't a 'should I get a pod hd vs. some other interface' thread, so no need to worry. now that that's out of the way i'm thinking of purchasing the pod hd 300 this christmas, and i just want to make sure i'm making the right choice with this. i don't...

if i remember correctly, the ones that weren't in proportion were photoshops, just to get an image out so people could see what it was, it's proportional in real life.

fixed the two relatively small problems i mentioned, shit. nice job, i almost want to replace the original with this version, haha.

shiiit, this sounds incredibly punchy. i wish the whole album sounded like this, i love it, but its so hard to get into due to the tinny production. also, i'd watch a couple parts, like the extra noises on the slides at the beginning, and the major sweeps sound a bit rough at certain parts...

this is probably a stupid question, but when i saw veil of maya, their bassist had 7 strings.. how exactly would you tune and effectively use a bass with that much range with a simple 6 string guitar tuned to drop B? (forgive my ignorance, i am a guitar player by heart, i really know NOTHING...

i use a 11-49 set, and use it to tune from drop C to that one periphery tuning Bb G C F A D, sometimes C# standard, and other times, drop B. unless you're tuning extremely low, having a .068 for a B just seems ridiculous, especially on a baritone scale, where you could get by using somewhat...