Drew
Forum MVP
D-EJ915 said:
That's sort of my point. Just because the mechanics are there doesn't necessarily mean the physical attraction is.
Anyone else obsessed with Tatu? [NWS language]
- Thread starter David
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
That's sort of my point. Just because the mechanics are there doesn't necessarily mean the physical attraction is.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Akrin
5/4 > most
Regor said:
Quick google:
Donnie said:Maybe on television.
I take it you don't know many real lesbians.
Want concrete proof Donnie's right? Go to a Melissa Ethridge show.
Sentient said:I think you guys are talkin' about two different things. I think it'd be a safe assumption that most guys do NOT find the following description of a lesbian attractive: Overweight butch-lookin' females with guy haircuts, dressed in flannel, and driving pickup trucks. However, I think that a large amount of the male population DO find the following description of a lesbian attractive: Hot lookin', young feminine gals in sexy attire kissin' & touchin' each other in a sexual manner.
Guys often refer to the latter as lesbians, when in fact, they're likely just hot gals that aren't afraid of a bit of "bi" action, while they aspire to gain fame & notoriety by getting onto "Girls Gone Wild vol. 666". I think the truer definition of the word lesbian is more along the lines of what Naren is describing. And I don't think any of us wanna see THAT kissin' & touchin'...
ding ding ding! We have a winner. Butch, fat nasty (Rosie O'Donnell) lesbians = bad
Angelina Jolie - type experimental girls = good
noodles
Contributor
eaeolian said:Want concrete proof Donnie's right? Go to a Melissa Ethridge show.
Thanks, dick!
lol, OF COURSE THEY AREN'T really lesbians, so stop fucking arguing about it. It's called money, we all know htat.
Soo hott, hahaha
Soo hott, hahaha
