Anyone here know or own this Suhr?

[Metlupass2]

It was purchased used in December at Dave's Guitar Shop in WI.


2011 Suhr Modern Transparent White / Mary Kay | Reverb

I think this particular one is pure sex and I WANT IT!

I'll give $50 to anyone who can give me any info that helps me purchase this guitar. you

I asked the shop but they told me they had no idea.

Thanks

 

[xzyryabx]

That IS pure sex!!!

 

[Vede]

Looks like the person who ordered that Suhr is a fan of Chris Broderick:

 

[loqtrall]

I actually have one, bought from Andy's Guitars in Tallahassee, FL. It's a bit different than the one pictured in the OP, and I'm not willing to get rid of it, but I thought I'd let you know that I know what it is!

 

[Metlupass2]

Beautiful. I remember that one well. IF you do ever decide to part with it PLEASE let me know.

That one have the pearloid covers and roasted neck?

 

[loqtrall]

That one have the pearloid covers and roasted neck?

It does. I think the spec sheet actually describes the neck as "museum-grade roasted birdseye."

 

[Metlupass2]

Yeah that's like a $700 up charge.

 

[rreeves]

Wow thats a nice Suhr

 

[absolutorigin]

Awesome finish right there.

 

[liamh]

Can you not just order a guitar with the same specs from the custom shop?

 

[Metlupass2]

Of course but I like that one.

 

[HighGain510]

Yep there have actually been a handful of Suhrs that were ordered with the trans-white Broderick specs now. Some have had normal headstocks, couple had reverse. They ALL looked hot regardless!

 

[Metlupass2]

Where have you seen more?

 

[Metlupass2]

Bump

 

[Adam Of Angels]

I haven't seen it, but it's gorgeous. I just played two nice reverse headstock Moderns yesterday, and now I'm all turned on to the idea. This thread hasn't helped

Good luck in the hunt, man.

 

[yingmin]

I asked the shop but they told me they had no idea.

Even if they do know, it would be pretty unethical of them to share the owner's information with you.

 

[Metlupass2]

Even if they do know, it would be pretty unethical of them to share the owner's information with you.

How would it be unethical? I've had luck tracking certain guitars simply by asking previous owners.


I've since acquired a white Modern but I'd still like to find this one someday.

Here's mine.

 

[ToneLab]

How would it be unethical? I've had luck tracking certain guitars simply by asking previous owners.


I've since acquired a white Modern but I'd still like to find this one someday.

Here's mine.

Nice guitar. Let's see the rest of that collection@!

 

[Metlupass2]

Bump for the hell of it.

 

[yingmin]

Then I guess I'll answer this question for the hell of it.

How would it be unethical? I've had luck tracking certain guitars simply by asking previous owners.

Whether or not it's worked for you in the past has no bearing on whether or not it's ethical. The shop presumably doesn't have the owner's permission to share his information, and there may even be laws against sharing information like that. If the shop, or whoever has information about the current owner, were to contact the owner and tell him that you're looking for it, that would be one thing. But a shop giving away a customer's contact information to some stranger without the customer's consent would be unethical.