HeHasTheJazzHands
Well-Known Member
May have to tune that lower to compensate the brightness.
It's funny because it's my D# standard guitar.
May have to tune that lower to compensate the brightness.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I have EMGs in maple neck throughs with alder wings. Sounds good.
That's what you get for not putting the 85 in the bridge where it belongs.I got impatient and wired it up.
...If you love mids and treble, this combination is for you.
That's what you get for not putting the 85 in the bridge where it belongs.
The 81 is the one that would look better in your rubbish bin.Half right. The 85 is in the wrong place.
It actually belongs in the trash.
I got impatient and wired it up.
...If you love mids and treble, this combination is for you.
Lol I hate the 81 in the bridge. Can't add what isn't there, and what isn't there, is much of any bass. If I need to cut bass to tighten up the 85, I can just use a tube screamer.Okay so I got curious and swapped the 81x for the 85x
...81x went right back into the bridge.
Lol I hate the 81 in the bridge. Can't add what isn't there, and what isn't there, is much of any bass. If I need to cut bass to tighten up the 85, I can just use a tube screamer.
Well, I tend to go for a Marshall style tone, which I don't think has much bass usually. Furthermore, I think the 81 is a double edged sword for EMG, and has done as much damage to their brand as it has good. The notion that EMGs are sterile, lifeless, only good for metal, etc. is because of the 81 and how people set them up in guitars (ie, as close to the strings as possible), and set up used (ie, tube screamer into a metal amp).I guess that's true, but you can add bass later in the chain and end up with a ballsy rather than muddy tone. I've never been wanting to add bass pre gain, only cut.