Anyone Keep Going Back To EMG?

  • Thread starter lewis
  • Start date
  • Tags
    emg pickups
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Aliascent

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2018
Messages
171
Reaction score
158
I recently traded my Ibanez RGT6EXFX for a LTD F250 that came with HZ in them, and that was the first time I got my hands on those since 2005-07.

I love the way the bridge one sound, you can hear a hint of 81 in it, and it's still tight at C#. I can't get the neck to not sound muddy though, I can get a good lead sound from it but rythm is no bueno. I'll tinker with it some more, but no success for far.

Also got a Jackson Rhoads (JS32l) as partof a trade, slapped a 85 in the bridge, single volume no tone. Which is absolutely fantastic and I wish EMG offered a 85/60 set.
 

Spaced Out Ace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
11,616
Reaction score
6,767
Location
Indiana
I love the way the bridge one sound, you can hear a hint of 81 in it, and it's still tight at C#. I can't get the neck to not sound muddy though, I can get a good lead sound from it but rythm is no bueno. I'll tinker with it some more, but no success for far.
What is the scale length? How many frets? Also, what height are the pickups at?
 

CrushingAnvil

Ironically enough, now in Jesus Land
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
8,542
Reaction score
1,615
Location
Wellington, New Zealand
I recently traded my Ibanez RGT6EXFX for a LTD F250 that came with HZ in them, and that was the first time I got my hands on those since 2005-07.

I love the way the bridge one sound, you can hear a hint of 81 in it, and it's still tight at C#. I can't get the neck to not sound muddy though, I can get a good lead sound from it but rythm is no bueno. I'll tinker with it some more, but no success for far.

Also got a Jackson Rhoads (JS32l) as partof a trade, slapped a 85 in the bridge, single volume no tone. Which is absolutely fantastic and I wish EMG offered a 85/60 set.
Fret the 24th fret and set them basically as close to the strings as possible without them touching in any way while the strings are vibrating, then adjust from there. The same rule of adjusting pickups applies here too, it's just that EMG's don't have the same magnetic pull as passives, so you can run them closer.
 

Spaced Out Ace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
11,616
Reaction score
6,767
Location
Indiana
Gross. Do not do that. That is the reason EMGs have the bad reputation they have. Thanks, EMG. Why they'd print that in their literature and give people the impression they SHOULD be set like that is beyond me.
 

Zhysick

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
2,934
Reaction score
1,920
Location
Galiza
Fret the 24th fret and set them basically as close to the strings as possible without them touching in any way while the strings are vibrating, then adjust from there. The same rule of adjusting pickups applies here too, it's just that EMG's don't have the same magnetic pull as passives, so you can run them closer.
Nah, the low magnetic pull is only with active EMGs so those (HZ H4 pickups) are not to be set like that.

On the other hand, as Spaced Out Ace said, that's the way the EMGs sounds worse. Lot's of people like it, surez but only because they are looking for maximum gain and not looking for better clarity or dynamics.

Anyway, to each its own. If you like them REALLY close, good for you. There are no rules about tone but objectively speaking, you have more headroom if the pickups are not that close.
 

Spaced Out Ace

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
11,616
Reaction score
6,767
Location
Indiana
Nah, the low magnetic pull is only with active EMGs so those (HZ H4 pickups) are not to be set like that.

On the other hand, as Spaced Out Ace said, that's the way the EMGs sounds worse. Lot's of people like it, surez but only because they are looking for maximum gain and not looking for better clarity or dynamics.

Anyway, to each its own. If you like them REALLY close, good for you. There are no rules about tone but objectively speaking, you have more headroom if the pickups are not that close.
I do the same with actives. I set them between 3-4/32", as you would most pickups. Cranking them close sounds horrible and got the brand a shit reputation.
 

The Monster With .

Death row; water buffalo
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
229
Reaction score
290
I have my 57-7 like a few mil from the strings, sounds awesome.

I recently got an 81-7x/85-7x set, and haven't really been enjoying them. I think I'll try raising them up. Headroom is overrated.😆
 

gclef

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
526
Reaction score
240
Location
FLA
My opinion of my 57/66tws is ever evolving. For the better usually.

This time I discovered my neck was a bit to straight and was choking the highs out. I didn't hear it unplugged. A little relief does wonders.

What I got was the super bright, detailed highs that everyone talks about. Holy crap!

Now I have to adjust the eq in my emg patches, dammit. Lol.

The jury is still out until i figure out the eq i need, but so far, I like them alot more now though.


Nah, the low magnetic pull is only with active EMGs so those (HZ H4 pickups) are not to be set like that.

On the other hand, as Spaced Out Ace said, that's the way the EMGs sounds worse. Lot's of people like it, surez but only because they are looking for maximum gain and not looking for better clarity or dynamics.

Anyway, to each its own. If you like them REALLY close, good for you. There are no rules about tone but objectively speaking, you have more headroom if the pickups are not that close.

I do the same with actives. I set them between 3-4/32", as you would most pickups. Cranking them close sounds horrible and got the brand a shit repreputation
Totally! I am much happier with them lower.
I have the 66 up close, then I back the 57 away until the volume is matched across all positions.
The 57 is HOT!! Lol.

When the bridge is to high with the TW set, the single coil sounds disproportionately louder than the neck.
I balance them in single mode.
 

HeHasTheJazzHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
37,416
Reaction score
31,116
Location
Louisiana
On a different note; I finally tried the Duncan EMTY full set again after like 6 - 7 years of last trying them

Yeah just get a Het or JR set if you want that stupid hot active sound.
 

TonyFlyingSquirrel

Cherokee Warrior
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
4,701
Reaction score
1,715
Location
Auburn, Washington
The 5
My opinion of my 57/66tws is ever evolving. For the better usually.

This time I discovered my neck was a bit to straight and was choking the highs out. I didn't hear it unplugged. A little relief does wonders.

What I got was the super bright, detailed highs that everyone talks about. Holy crap!

Now I have to adjust the eq in my emg patches, dammit. Lol.

The jury is still out until i figure out the eq i need, but so far, I like them alot more now though.





Totally! I am much happier with them lower.

The 57 is HOT!! Lol.

When the bridge is to high with the TW set, the single coil sounds disproportionately louder than the neck.
I balance them in single modeis nowhere near as hot as the 81


The 5
My opinion of my 57/66tws is ever evolving. For the better usually.

This time I discovered my neck was a bit to straight and was choking the highs out. I didn't hear it unplugged. A little relief does wonders.

What I got was the super bright, detailed highs that everyone talks about. Holy crap!

Now I have to adjust the eq in my emg patches, dammit. Lol.

The jury is still out until i figure out the eq i need, but so far, I like them alot more now though.





Totally! I am much happier with them lower.

The 57 is HOT!! Lol.

When the bridge is to high with the TW set, the single coil sounds disproportionately louder than the neck.
I balance them in single mode.
The 57 is nowhere near as hot as the 81 or even the 89 in my experience. Just don’t slam it up against the strings.
 


Top
')