Axe-fx out of stock

  • Thread starter metalheadpunk
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

metalheadpunk

NUTRICULA
Contributor
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
478
Reaction score
36
Location
Fort Collins, CO
just heard from Fractal that it will be a couple of weeks. Ouch! I am without a proper rig until I get it! Oh well. will be awesome no matter how long i have to wait.
 

Sippin40oz

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
273
Reaction score
7
Location
Derby
Must be making a fortune on these things now days. The design hasnt really changed in years and i would assume dsp chips and screens etc have all dropped in price a lot as the tech gets older. Add to that econmies of scale on the increase in units sold!

Think we need a new updated unit to GAS over! :agreed:
 

technomancer

Gearus Pimptasticus
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
30,379
Reaction score
13,316
Location
Out there, somewhere
Must be making a fortune on these things now days. The design hasnt really changed in years and i would assume dsp chips and screens etc have all dropped in price a lot as the tech gets older. Add to that econmies of scale on the increase in units sold!

Think we need a new updated unit to GAS over! :agreed:

Given the chips used were literally bleeding edge when the system was designed not sure how much improvement / cost dropping has taken place. DSP cpus don't tend to evolve as quickly as PC cpus. The economy of scale has to be helping a good bit though ;)

I think we're likely to see products Fractal has in-progress come out before we see a new Axe unit. The foot controller just finally released a couple of weeks ago, the editor isn't at 1.0 yet, and the software version w/associated hardware controller is still in progress. Not to mention ongoing firmware updates, since the existing models and effects aren't tapping out the current hardware yet.
 

technomancer

Gearus Pimptasticus
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
30,379
Reaction score
13,316
Location
Out there, somewhere
Wow it's actually been longer than I thought... I just looked and I was on the waiting list in early 2007, which I believe was when they released :eek:

Using a bit of google-foo the Ultra uses the BittWare TigerSHARC ADSP-TS201S processor running at 600MHz. This is till their top of the line chip.
 

Taylor2

Do you even lift
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
313
Location
Calgary
just heard from Fractal that it will be a couple of weeks. Ouch! I am without a proper rig until I get it! Oh well. will be awesome no matter how long i have to wait.

Really?
I was told on the weekend it would be early this week.


:wallbash:

LAME
I want the Axe.
 

beneharris

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2010
Messages
1,849
Reaction score
228
Location
Flagstaff
600mhz?
What could they do if they used like a quadcore pentium chip? @_@
that would be majorly overkill. 600mhz is blazing fast for things like that. their software would be the bottleneck at this point i believe
 

biggness

Contributor
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
935
Reaction score
309
Location
Sulphur, LA
Actually, pound for pound, dsp's pwn the ever living hell out of "regular" processors. Dsp's are purpose built, as where processors have to cover a lot of "unknown" if that makes sense. I will see if I can find the post I read where Cliff benchmarked the Ultra against an i7 quad core Mac Pro with amazing results.
 

Andromalia

Pardon my french
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
8,750
Reaction score
3,215
Location
Le Mans, France
600mhz?
What could they do if they used like a quadcore pentium chip? @_@

In that kind of apps, power isn't necessarily the prime objective, latency is. Modeling doesn't require so much power, it just requires the proper algorythms. Your quad pentium chip would likely be able to process an orchestra of edges playing with 4 delays each...with a latency making it useless for live purposes.
In a broader topic, specialised apps and hardware require less power than multipurpose ones. (which a computer is) Take your cell phone, what good would it make to have a quad core inside, it wouldn't make you talk faster. ^^
 

technomancer

Gearus Pimptasticus
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
30,379
Reaction score
13,316
Location
Out there, somewhere
600mhz?
What could they do if they used like a quadcore pentium chip? @_@

To summarize a whole hell of a lot less than it does now. DSP chips are specialized and do exponentially more work per clock cycle with much lower latency than general purpose CPUs like those used in desktop/laptop computers. That's why specialized processors exist.

Actually, pound for pound, dsp's pwn the ever living hell out of "regular" processors. Dsp's are purpose built, as where processors have to cover a lot of "unknown" if that makes sense. I will see if I can find the post I read where Cliff benchmarked the Ultra against an i7 quad core Mac Pro with amazing results.

Definitely post that, I missed it :lol: The Axe should pwn a desktop because there's no storage latency etc etc etc that you have with a desktop.
 
Top
')