TedEH
Cromulent
I think it is. Our company was forced to have a "francization" comity. We're also required to report to the government whoever doesn't speak french. That..... is a very uncomfortable idea. People I've spoken with are confused about what the law actually expects. Some think it's a simple percentage, some believe they're given names. I think the vagueness is intentional.Are things getting visibly worse since some of the new language laws kicked in June?
Consider for a moment, that when asked about it, Jean-François Roberge had to be explicit that "We are not doing cards or certificates or anything like that", when referring to identifying who gets certain exceptions allowing anglophones to speak english in government communications. Like, why even bring that up if it's not a concern? How do you reach the conclusion that you need to clarify something like that without stopping to introspect about how you got to that in the first place?