This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I'm probably beyond redemption, but thanks anyway.
Based on that Instagram photo, the next flashpoint of criticism will probably be the disappearing top on the forearm cut....
Is it bad that I think that looks good?
Why does Carvin even show at NAMM if they don't have a dealer network? I understand the artist exposure angle but it seems like they could put all those resources into direct meetings with artists they are courting instead of showing a bunch of stuff to MI folks who wont be able to become dealers.
Why does Carvin even show at NAMM if they don't have a dealer network? I understand the artist exposure angle but it seems like they could put all those resources into direct meetings with artists they are courting instead of showing a bunch of stuff to MI folks who wont be able to become dealers.
I do want a tiny guitar, that is the whole damn point of going headless - make the guitar smaller for storing it in tiny places and playing it in tiny spaces.
Not at all, but based on past experience I think it's likely to be a contentious point. You just keep on with your bad self.
I wish they would have continued the beveling instead of leaving the forearm area at a soft bend, but man that is hot
And then there's the whole "hurr durr order a Holdsworth or an old Steinberger" argument...
Hey! I never said "hurr durr!" Stop putting words in my mouth!
Alright, so what should the specs be then?
The sides on that headless bridge have always looked uncomfortable to me. Why are they so unnecessarily high?