CS Jackson 8 String @ NAMM

  • Thread starter Altair4
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Guamskyy

Hwat you call me?
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
1,390
Reaction score
338
Location
Spring, Texas
If I had 5k laying around and a lot of time on my hands, I would order a Jackson CS 8!
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Konfyouzd

Return of the Dread-I
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
23,589
Reaction score
2,303
Location
Seattle, WA
Why do 90% of companies 8 string guitars all look the same. Damn EMGs making the guitars look bland as hell. ;)

I doubt it's the EMGs... Maybe it's the fact that 90% of them are SUPERSTRATS with EIGHT FUCKING STRINGS... :idea:
 

Variant

Banned
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
6,442
Reaction score
1,180
Location
All-white-tukee, Arizona
This may amount to nothing, but this has me questioning the practicality of the headstock. Picture I made myself.

jackson8.jpg

:rofl: @ that headstock.
 

travis bickle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2010
Messages
253
Reaction score
55
Location
NYC
that headstock looks HORRIBLE. and this is coming from a usa jackson fanboi too.
 

Konfyouzd

Return of the Dread-I
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
23,589
Reaction score
2,303
Location
Seattle, WA
I don't think it's that bad... It is a tad obnoxious, but I could still get down w/ that.

Also, I dunno if a straight 4+4 headstock wouldn't be just as boring since it's already been stated that superstrat ERGs sporting EMGs have been a bit overdone.

Might be cool to see an offset like a 6+2 headstock or something similar... Don't the JP7s have like a 5+2 or something like that?

I just think it might be cool to experiment with some configs that are a tad less "conventional"
 

Funz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2010
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Location
Tx
that headstock is ridiculous.
4+4 is the way to go to keep the thing under a foot long :p
 

Philligan

The White-Knuckler
Contributor
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
4,131
Reaction score
490
Location
Sarnia, ON, Canada
The more I look at it, I honestly am really starting to like it. I'd prefer the 4x4 headstock, but if it balances decently, I'd deal with it.

At least it's not black. :yesway:
 

vlover

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
297
Reaction score
4
Location
oakland
Why does every headstock like that, that is 8 strings looks TOO big! Not right I tell ya!
 

canuck brian

Bowes Guitars
Contributor
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
3,628
Reaction score
907
Location
Toronto
This guitar was built by Luthier Pablo Santana - it'll cost $4200. Regarding the neck and the offset truss rod.

It also has a new design feature that Pablo came up with called the Jackson Asymetrical Neck/ Offset Trussrod. Basically the neck profile is fatter near the lower strings and gradually tapers as it gets to the high E string. The Trussrod is also offset and runs through the thicker portion of the neck.

That's really irritating to read considering Tobias was doing that YEARS (over a decade) ago and I've been doing it on all my guitars for almost 2 years. :wallbash:
 

sell2792

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
1,838
Reaction score
757
Location
Sarasota, FL
Jackson NEEDS to make some new models asap. More specifically, more 7s and definately more SLS's. If they made a 7 string SLS I'd blow a load.
 

eaeolian

Pictures of guitars I don't even own anymore!
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
15,464
Reaction score
3,915
Location
Woodbridge, VA
Jackson NEEDS to make some new models asap. More specifically, more 7s and definately more SLS's. If they made a 7 string SLS I'd blow a load.

Well, there's the Broderick, and the SLAT3-7. The only way I can think of to expand the 7s market is to start doing the other shapes, but odd-shaped 7s don't have a good history of success...

Oh, and they'll make you an SLS-7. ;)
 


Latest posts

Top
')