JJ Rodriguez
Contributor
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 14,733
- Reaction score
- 1,353
I love the way EMG's look too, clean and simple. If only they were a bit shorter
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I love the way EMG's look too, clean and simple. If only they were a bit shorter
Would people be more inclined to swap out EMG's if there were direct replacements on the market? Absolutely.
.
Actually, in this case, probably not, the video on Duncan's site already stated (or at least alluded to), that tonally these would sound like a 707 or 81-7, the only advantages to the player "12 to 14 db" less noise. Since most (if not all) users of the 707 and 81-7 use medium to high gain distortion, it also means that they use noise gates, which negates that advantage all together. Really, the only people I could even see buying this pickup is experimenters and early adopters in the short term, players who have difficulty finding EMG's in the long term, and as an OEM part.
Especially if they are in fact tonally similiar.
As far as "big establishment trying to fuck the little guy", if I'm wrong then find me a guitar maker anywhere on the planet that uses emg 7 string hz's as original equipment, and when you can't find one, ask yourself why, then read my EMG rant I posted some months ago for the answer.
According to Schecter's website, the Damien has HZ 7s in it.
Actually, in this case, probably not, the video on Duncan's site already stated (or at least alluded to), that tonally these would sound like a 707 or 81-7, the only advantages to the player "12 to 14 db" less noise. Since most (if not all) users of the 707 and 81-7 use medium to high gain distortion, it also means that they use noise gates, which negates that advantage all together.
It works on all other amps? That's just bizarre.
I though I do hate the fact that I'd have to buy a whole new guitar to do it; hell if I'm going to be taking a router to my Ibbies!
It would be nice if they'd make it standard size, and as far as I can see there's no reason that they couldn't. I doubt they will, though, especially if they're trying to go the "EMG replacement" route... although they have just as good of an opportunity to corner the "active pickups that don't force you to drill up your guitar" market, which I'm sure there's a huge demand for. The whole point of being a business is that you're trying to get people to buy your product, so you'd think they'd make a product that made things easier for people. I don't know. I guess it depends on what side of the market they're more interested in appealing to.
lol that's theodie, don't pay attention to himA guy in your thread said: "People still play 7 strings "
Typical...
A guy in your thread said: "People still play 7 strings "
Typical...
Actually, in this case, probably not, the video on Duncan's site already stated (or at least alluded to), that tonally these would sound like a 707 or 81-7, the only advantages to the player "12 to 14 db" less noise. Since most (if not all) users of the 707 and 81-7 use medium to high gain distortion, it also means that they use noise gates, which negates that advantage all together. Really, the only people I could even see buying this pickup is experimenters and early adopters in the short term, players who have difficulty finding EMG's in the long term, and as an OEM part.
Dude, a 12-14dB noise reduction is a LOT, especially if you're talking about noise gate thresholds.
You're making a lot of generalizations here that I don't think hold up - "passive users switch pickups all the time, active users don't and more importantly wouldn't if they could," "Actives are only for people who use high gain," "anyone who uses high gain also uses a noise gate," etc. The first one is the most blatantly false, but the rest of them are also pretty debatable.
Essentially, you're pissed at EMG, and taking it out on Seymore Duncan because they're possibly considering competing with EMG. I don't get it. That's not really doing any good, that's just misdirected hate.