Guitars with flatter necks?

  • Thread starter Bearitone
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Ross82

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
156
Reaction score
273
Location
Ontario, Canada
Another shout for the Jacksons, I had a MIJ Kelly with a compound neck that was really nice and thin but didn't feel "absent". If it had a satin neck finish it would have been the best neck I ever played but my current favourite is my Caparison which is very similar but not as thin as the Jackson but has a wonderful satin/natural finish.
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

HungryGuitarStudent

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
1,187
Reaction score
944
Location
Montreal
Honestly, apart the body wood, if I remind correctly the 11 and 12 are the same guitars.

Yeah, on paper they're practically the same, but the 12 I tried had a slightly thicker neck and just didn't have the lead tone the 11 had. Might have been just something specific with that build of the 12.

Digging more into this, I found this page with a JP spec comparison table. Unfortunately, it doesn't include neck thickess at 1-12 fret.

https://bluedesk.blogspot.com/2014/09/music-man-jp-comparison-chart.html
 
Last edited:

BabUShka

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1,055
Location
Norway
Another shout for the Jacksons, I had a MIJ Kelly with a compound neck that was really nice and thin but didn't feel "absent". If it had a satin neck finish it would have been the best neck I ever played but my current favourite is my Caparison which is very similar but not as thin as the Jackson but has a wonderful satin/natural finish.

I can confirm. I sold my MIJ Kelly, but it really had a nice neck. Feels like a hybrid of Gibson Slim Tapered 60s and Ibanez Wizard. If you like medium/thin flat neck, then that is a perfect combo.
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
1,887
Reaction score
2,079
Location
England
Kiesel Holdsworth?

Not sure what they did with the Ibanez RG565 reissue but that feels so thin and wide. Like abnormally so. Only guitar that’s ever given me wrist fatigue lol.
The reissue has a Super Wizard neck.
The original RG565 has an original Wizard neck.

The modern necks (Wizard + Super Wizard) are 2mm wider than the original Wizard.
The Wizard is 1mm thicker at 1st fret / same at 12th fret.
The Super Wizard is same thickness as original at 1st fret and 1mm thinner at 12th fret).
 

Hoss632

SS.org Regular
Joined
Sep 23, 2020
Messages
1,396
Reaction score
1,040
6 string wise the Jackson Dinky and Soloist I've tried have the "flattest" necks. Not necessarily the thinnest but the closest to a D shape. The Dinky I played felt really nice in the hand without being extremely thin like an Ibanez or the Schecter ultra thin C. Gibson slim taper and some of the Epiphone asym necks feel flat on the back as well.
I can definitely relate though on how 7 or 8 string necks feel better due to the flatness on the back. I played a sterling Jason Richardson 3 or 4 months ago and even for my small hands that guitar was VERY comfortable to play.
 

ixlramp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
1,994
Location
UK
I feel like I almost enjoy 8 string necks on some guitars over a 6 string necks just because they are so much flatter.

I like having some more “shoulder” to the neck so I have a bigger landing to rest my thumb.
Me too. The most comfortable back of neck i have played is the high frets of my Ibanez BTB 6 string bass, wide and quite flat.

A flat back of neck increases the contact area between thumb and neck, decreasing pressure.
The fingers exert quite a lot of pressure when fretting chords, which has to be balanced by the thumb pressure, so the thumb has to cope with a lot of pressure. A rounded back of neck concentrates the pressure into a smaller area, which i find noticeably uncomfortable, and is less healthy for the thumb.

A rounded back of neck also tends to limit the thumb to the centre of the neck more, because it needs to exert a force opposite in direction to the fretting force, perpendicular to the neck. The centre of a rounded neck back is the only position where a perpendicular force can be exerted.
A wide flat area on the back of the neck would allow the thumb to have more freedom of lateral position, as required depending on what the fretting fingers are doing, this would make technique more effective and more healthy.

There may be other reasons, but i suspect the main reason for most guitars having such rounded neck backs is because many players use a 'thumb-over' grip (a technique i dislike, sorry), so the neck is rounded to sit in the palm of the hand or crotch of the thumb.
 

gclef

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2010
Messages
522
Reaction score
239
Location
FLA
The reissue has a Super Wizard neck.
The original RG565 has an original Wizard neck.

The modern necks (Wizard + Super Wizard) are 2mm wider than the original Wizard.
The Wizard is 1mm thicker at 1st fret / same at 12th fret.
The Super Wizard is same thickness as original at 1st fret and 1mm thinner at 12th fret).

I have a super wizard from 99 and is 17/20mm

The new wizard prestiges are 17/19.
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
1,887
Reaction score
2,079
Location
England
I have a super wizard from 99 and is 17/20mm

The new wizard prestiges are 17/19.
The late 90s Super Wizard was a very brief return to the original Wizard profile, after the "Wizard" had increased to 18/20mm. Super Wizard soon changed to 17/19 (i.e became thinner).

The current Wizard is 18/20. The current Super Wizard is 17/19. This has been consistent for circa 20 years now.
Having "Prestige" added to the name is a reference to the fret edge treatment (a Premium Wizard is also 18/20, but has less time spent on the fret edges).
 
Top
')