I think Strandbergs suck

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Ray-T

SS.org Regular
Joined
Jan 27, 2024
Messages
60
Reaction score
55
I didn't really believe any of that more mass=more sustain nonsense either until I got a Gibson LP. That guitar can hold a note for almost ever, it's wild. I'm still not committing to an opinion because I really don't give a shit and I don't know why anyone would. Why the fuck do you need your guitar to sustain a note for 45 seconds? What purpose does that serve?

If I was in a guitar center and some dude was just holding a g note on a $7,000 Les Paul and his terrible tube amp treble tone all proud of himself I'd have to resist the urge to unplug his amp.
I just remembered how Periphery at some point used like 3 noise gates to make sure their guitars don't sustain. And also played Strandberg (before other companies with a big advertisement budget came to them).
 

Randy

✝✝✝
Super Moderator
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
25,871
Reaction score
18,902
Location
The Electric City, NY
Follower of Strandberg going back to when Ola was just blog posting trem designs, the prototype that was cut out of an actual strat and eventually the open licensing for the design.

Lots of cool stuff with this brand, though I think it eventually got a little stale. I kind of like an avante garde brand to stay unique in its offering and make the end user come to their vision rather than the other way around. At some point Strandberg became the same familiar silhouette with dozens of different variations in features in step with what you've been able to get from other brands for 70 years. Feels like a standard contour neck, fixed scale model with a head on it is just around the corner.
 

Surveyor 777

I measure things
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
563
Reaction score
304
Location
Wisconsin
Yeah that sums it up pretty well, and what keeps me coming back in circles still considering it. If you want a strandberg, only a strandberg is doing what strandberg is doing. Kind of the last frontier of actual innovation in guitar design to date

I wish I liked the color option of the essentials line. Totally comfortable with that price point. Lack of some features would be a bit of a bummer but probably could live with it. Fingers crossed some different colors come out eventually

I also like the price point of the Essentials line. As far as colors, I like the blue one. I'm just waiting for them to come out with maple fretboards. If they would have that blue w/maple fretboard and the same price, I'd get it.
 

Ray-T

SS.org Regular
Joined
Jan 27, 2024
Messages
60
Reaction score
55
Follower of Strandberg going back to when Ola was just blog posting trem designs, the prototype that was cut out of an actual strat and eventually the open licensing for the design.

Lots of cool stuff with this brand, though I think it eventually got a little stale. I kind of like an avante garde brand to stay unique in its offering and make the end user come to their vision rather than the other way around. At some point Strandberg became the same familiar silhouette with dozens of different variations in features in step with what you've been able to get from other brands for 70 years. Feels like a standard contour neck, fixed scale model with a head on it is just around the corner.
I don't like the price but I think that with the Meloria model innovation has made a return after Strandberg doing what feels like a 10 year innovation break.
 

spawnofthesith

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Messages
2,228
Reaction score
567
Location
Denver, CO
A 1 pound block of rubber will not vibrate the same as a 1 pound block of carbon fiber, both of which have kind of similar densities. Neither will a 1 pound block of said carbon fiber vs a 1 pound thin plate of the same material.

It's not just density though, but also shape. I admittedly forget half of my courses in vibrations, (not my area of expertise in my years after starting work as an engineer) but it really does come down to stiffness, mass of the oscillating/reciprocating body(ies), damping, and resonant frequencies. Guitars are very complex systems from a vibrations point of view, and the very shape of them will change not just things like decay and sustain, but also which harmonics will starting decaying first. The different parts of a guitar and their dimensions wiĺl also change its vibrational properties. A lot of these little details on their own are quite imperceptible to most people's ears.

My Oni Essi 8 is quite a light and thin guitar, but it acoustically projects sound very loudly, and it sustains for long. Dan has purposely designed it this way. An example of that is the inclusion of two carbon fiber rods in the headstock along the outer edges. Also, he gets away with having a super long neck on these guitars relative to body size because he has managed to make them quite stiff with all the internal carbon fiber structures he makes. I can't tell you that I know exactly what difference in sound and sustain these things make individually, but it's a ton of little considerations like these added together that can make a bigger difference. Props to all the skilled luthiers out there. These guys are basically engineers without a degree.

Also:

Vibrations are not "high school physics". They are a last-year course in mechanical engineering degrees, and use a ton of equations that draw parallels to electricity and magnetism laws as well as control systems. Entire graduate programs span out of vibrational analysis.


But I read on TGP that its the pickups only, that muppet man from nashville proved it
 

ArtDecade

Way Cool Jr
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
8,689
Reaction score
13,834
Location
c.1987
giphy.gif
 

groverj3

Bioinformagician
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
3,728
Reaction score
2,953
Location
Boston, MA
Played a Strandberg bodem 8 recently, and guess what? Itdid not suck at all

Is played and sounded nice and is was light and comfortable.
Off course I only applied sweeptapping and zeroonezerrozerroone riffs so don’t know for sustain
Binary metal
 

Pietjepieter

Contributor
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
828
Reaction score
941
Location
Rotterdam
Binary metal
01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01110010 01110101 01101100 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110011 01110100 01100001 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01110010 01100001 01110100 01100101 01100100 00100001 00100000 00001010
 

ArtDecade

Way Cool Jr
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
8,689
Reaction score
13,834
Location
c.1987
01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01110010 01110101 01101100 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01110101 01110011 01110100 01100001 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01110010 01100001 01110100 01100101 01100100 00100001 00100000 00001010
That is djent.
 

jco5055

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
1,503
Reaction score
907
Location
Brooklyn, NY
I don't think Strandbergs suck, but I do think the hype was IMMENSE back in the pre-production age (I'm thinking when I was in college, and I graduated in 2013). Since then, it's obviously died a bit from the "ultimate ergonomic guitar" ethos it seemed to have. Actually playing the models, and I've played a lot thanks to them being available at Guitar Centers etc, they are fine but definitely don't have that "wow" factor I find in stuff like ESP original/custom shop models for example. I think if they were cheaper (Like what we expect from Indonesian guitars in general) I'd maybe pick one up just for that headless itch.

I honestly don't even think they are as ergonomic as they're marketed as. I actually do like the neck, but the bolt on models are still a bit clunky at the heel, and I think the Boden body shape is actually not ergonomic compared to like a Klein or Forshage Orion....When I played an Orion that thing was eye opening for how just absolutely PERFECT it was position wise.

I would like to try the J Artisan models, but man that price tag is absolutely ridiculous.
 

Mechanos71

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
181
Reaction score
99
Location
Newport, RI
It is always entertaining reading internet arguments about sustain. I do enjoy my strandberg, but mine is an older washburg (formerly Aaron Marshall's). Honestly my biggest complaint about it is there isn't enough travel in the action adjustment screws to lower it as far as I would like, but its been great to me over the years and is just super easy to take with you on a roadtrip to get some practice in when you are away from home.
 

swimrunner

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
15
Reaction score
13
Location
Maryland USA
It is always entertaining reading internet arguments about sustain. I do enjoy my strandberg, but mine is an older washburg (formerly Aaron Marshall's). Honestly my biggest complaint about it is there isn't enough travel in the action adjustment screws to lower it as far as I would like, but its been great to me over the years and is just super easy to take with you on a roadtrip to get some practice in when you are away from home.
If it is like the modern NX ones, there are springs under the screws. You can re-seat, clip, or try a different spring.
 

jco5055

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
1,503
Reaction score
907
Location
Brooklyn, NY
Same but yeah. Laughable that they cost 2-3x what Sugi's actual guitars cost :ugh:
I got to play one at the Axe Palace a few years ago (was the personal guitars of one of the employees) and I remember thinking they were pretty nice, but yeah prices are crazy but I guess expected considering what the regular Indo bergs go for
 

gh0styboi

Everybody Poops
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
449
Reaction score
591
I also like the price point of the Essentials line.
Honestly, it's the only Strandberg I'm considering at this point. I can't see paying what they're asking for the more costly lines just because Ola made an (admittedly) cool and efficient body shape and a flat-backed neck, or the NX line because they've got fancier tops and Fishmans. Not saying they're crap, I just don't know that I believe that it's going to be superior or even equal to the S Prestige I've got, and if I'm paying what Strandberg is asking for those guitars, that's my bar.
 

Ray-T

SS.org Regular
Joined
Jan 27, 2024
Messages
60
Reaction score
55
Honestly, it's the only Strandberg I'm considering at this point. I can't see paying what they're asking for the more costly lines just because Ola made an (admittedly) cool and efficient body shape and a flat-backed neck, or the NX line because they've got fancier tops and Fishmans. Not saying they're crap, I just don't know that I believe that it's going to be superior or even equal to the S Prestige I've got, and if I'm paying what Strandberg is asking for those guitars, that's my bar.
I also like the price point of the Essentials line. As far as colors, I like the blue one. I'm just waiting for them to come out with maple fretboards. If they would have that blue w/maple fretboard and the same price, I'd get it.
As an internet observer, doesn't the Essential have better hardware and no zero fret that will get dented and make pling noise over time?
 
Top
')