I could see that happeningNah they're recessed. If you look close you can see the paint going into the cavities
I do wonder IF they do get some kinda C&D they'll pull some kinda "I'm being silenced/cancelled!!!' thing lol
I could see that happeningNah they're recessed. If you look close you can see the paint going into the cavities
I do wonder IF they do get some kinda C&D they'll pull some kinda "I'm being silenced/cancelled!!!' thing lol
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Are these top-mount floyd’s?
Are these top-mount floyd’s? If so, that’s pretty on the nose. No doubt someone got a phone call soon after these were announced to the public.
I can only imagine Kiesel and Co balking at a legal phone call until a formal C&D letter shows up.
Pretty sure they're all recessed, the Photoshop touchups + low resolution just makes it hard to see.The ones on the ends look recessed, but the middle ones aren't (at least to my eye). Top-mount is what Eddie used. At least they got that right...
I'm not sure if you're serious (or what a communist industrial subsidy offset guitar is) but I think people do need to be consistent in where they draw the ethical line. I don't like Chinese knock off strandbergs any more than this Kiesel EVH. But, I also don't buy the straw man that "everything is a copy of a Strat" either.Let's pick a hill to die on with this shit at least. The way I see the wind blowing around here it seems to be:
American made splatter variations from a famous dead guy's meme guitar = bad.
Chinese communist industrial subsidy offset guitars undercutting American luthiers = good.
Price dumping. In this case specifically with products directly resultant of IP theft instead of in house innovation or development, which is not uncommon at fucking all in the East.industrial subsidy offset
Price dumping. In this case specifically with products directly resultant of IP theft instead of in house innovation or development, which is not uncommon at fucking all in the East.
Chinese communist industrial subsidy "offset guitars" undercutting American luthiers = good.
On this particular subject, the EVH Kiesel, I am quite sure there is a way to do this right. I'm also quite sure Jeff Kiesel has no idea how to do that, because he simply doesn't care. It's just all hubris and profit for him. He's like the fast fashion of the guitar industry.
People are going to buy what they want, just pick a hill to die on about it is all I'm saying. Seems like a lot of folks just don't like Jeff, and as I don't have strong feelings about him or EVH I find it funny folks are picking at these guitars- which are definitely better than the frankenshit coming out of the East by every single technical and ethic metric.Tacky money grabs are only okay if they're domestic apparently.
I wonder what the turn around time for that special finish would be...I definitely wouldn't want Jeff Kiesel's eruption splatter on my guitar![]()
I'm happy to debate this stuff, actually. The whole idea comes up a lot, and I'm not entirely sure I could codify my opinion on it even if I tried.poor take imo .
The guitar industry has been copying Les Paul and Strat shapes since the beginning of electric guitars , yet alone paint jobs . Does that mean every single guitar maker with a tobacco burst guitar is hubris and profit ?
They say imitation is the greatest form of flattery , I’m pretty sure Eddie would be stoked to see people rocking a guitar with this paint job , obviously we all know that splatter paint job is related to him , but at the end of the day it still is a fairly universal idea and has been done in multiple industries for decades , and it is not an original idea . There has been many companies who have done this already , hell I know a local shop who has one in this exact finish for sale right now ;
View attachment 147292
So why aren’t you and everyone else up in arms about the others who also do it ? Unless the paint job is trademarked , which would be silly , I say fair play to everyone who wants to do it … it’s literally just paint .
While I think it’s noble , and I understand where people are coming from to a degree to validate Eddies massive presence in music , and the relation to the guitars to EVH as a brand , at the end of the day I think Eddie would be stoked to see anyone pick up a guitar and play . Red paint or not . I don’t think Kiesel doing a limited launch is going to water down the EVH image , as I mentioned it has been done way before Kiesel .
Same logic applies for Dime’s slimeburst finish . Scott from Anthrax just released his signature guitar based on his guitar , and Jackson sells thousands of them , but you don’t bat an eye to that ? Jackson will make more money off that than Kiesel will , and Fender is already controls majority of the market … hypocritical thinking if you ask me .
Anyways that’s my 0.02 , I think this forums fascination with gatekeeping and bashing has become pretty sad , it is just paint . That being said , if EVH is really that over the top with protecting a paint job , I think that’s pretty lame as well .
Agree to disagreeAnyway, apologies for the rant, but I wanted to respond.
Did you say returns? No returns, option 50, only buy.I wonder what the turn around time for that special finish would be...
Same here. I should spend more time playing guitar, and less time talking about guitar, that's for sure.Agree to disagree
I woke up on the wrong side of the bed and you definitely caught some strays there , but I appreciate the insight and has definitely made me reconsider some things .
I’m a diehard Eddie fan , just wanna see people rock and roll and not worry about a finishI was also unaware it was copywriten !
EVH estate lawyers looking at this likeI'm guessing there's enough of a distinction where the EVH estate can't do anything.