This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I wonder if the whole nothing above or below is just a cover their ass statement.
True. I'll have to see what the openings look like on top and bottom, seem like it's not all solid metal but there's a cooling hole.Think depth of the units above and below as well, I wouldn't concider a behringer tuner as even being there.
I think AMS and ZZSounds stocks them. But Gearhounds is a trustworthy site, from what I'm told and read. They also have sweet deals pretty often.
I think AMS and ZZSounds stocks them. But Gearhounds is a trustworthy site, from what I'm told and read. They also have sweet deals pretty often.
I was thinking of buying a Roland quad-capture interface to start recording, and was also starting to look for a small tube head (5150 III most likely). But now with this!!!
I just want to be clear: Could the IRT studio accomplish what both of these would do? meaning, can it be a proper small tube head and interface as it is? or would an interface still be preferred over the IRT studio for recording purposes? Aside from the additional ins/outs on the interface, phantom power and preamp on an interface, would it still be 'sufficient' (for lack of a better word) to use the IRT studio as an interface if I'm only going to be recording one guitar with it?
I could always get an interface later for additional features, but just wanted to know how capable the IRT could be for recording purposes.
It can only record at 16bit / 48khz
That is the important part.The tones are just like its big brothers and kick ass !!!!
L´envoi de votre commande contient les articles suivants:
=========================================================
001.00 LANEY IRT-STUDIO
all-valve guitar head, 15 W, 2x EL84 & 3x ECC83, <1W input
option for cranked power tube tones at low volume, Full
IRONHEART pre-amplifier (3 channels, pre-boost, pull boost
numéro d'article: 305321, quantité: 1 Pc(s)