Laney Ironheart Studio 15W Rack Amp, 15W Mini Amp, and 15W TI Combo (New for 2013)

  • Thread starter HeHasTheJazzHands
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

22km Tombstone

Pro Apologizer
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
356
Reaction score
71
Location
Calgary, Canada
this is the dropbox link, they will upload in the next minutes. total is 13 pics
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/x152d744m9n4doj/6IbMii6aR6

i shot it in context to get the size

Cool, thanks for the pics (nice pics, btw!) It seems quite compact indeed...

You mentioned you have it hooked up to your interface through the headphone jack - why not use the FX send if you're just using it direct in?

Looking forward to hearing a riff or two.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
thanks
i'll get an XLR cable tomorrow i guess for the DI
 

stormrider66

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
116
Reaction score
10
Location
France
That's too bad - can you elaborate at all, for those of us who are considering buying one?

Well, as there is a 4 months newborn at home, I play a lot on headphones, and I have to say that in this configuration the sound wasn't good.
It is supposed to be a high gain preamp, but when I was pushing gain high, there was a sort of clipping in the distortion, and overall sound was very bad, very muddy.

Through a cab (Engl with WGS loudspeaker) the sound is way better.

But the distortion is so tight (and I like tight distortion), that the palm muted notes sound thin, without body.

This is what I feel with my gear, and you know, it's just a matter of taste. It is just not for me.
 

guitarfishbay

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
389
Reaction score
32
Location
UK
Firstly, thanks for the review. I've got a few questions/observations from owning the 120h.

-solid 4 button footswitch - boost and reverb are simple ON/OFF selecting between the channels clean/rhythm/lead is more tricky and it involves was is set up on the actual amp (5meter! footswitch cable incluuded)

It is pretty easy to use when you're used to it. Basically the Lead channel always takes precedence. So clean/rhythm works like having a one button footswitch like on some 2 channel amps, and lead always is on when lead is selected. It is a bit annoying that there isn't another switch so 3 individual switches, but it is easy to use when you're used to it. When you are on the lead channel you can change which mode is engaged on the clean/rhythm switch so you can get it ready for when you switch lead off.

nowhere said:
-clean/rhythm share the same EQ but different volumes
-lead channel is identical as far as I understood with the rhythm. same gain stages and overall gain amount as I can tell

-global boost - footswitchable. no complaints as of now up until 3-4,
-global reverb - i personaly dont care about this

-global tone: like resonance
-global "dynamics" - which it says it has to do with bass tightness.

-no standby switch for some reason.

Firstly, are the rhythm and lead actually identical? I know you can EQ them to sound very near the same on the 120h but if you set all controls to 12:00 the lead channel has more bass and less treble. Rhythm is definitely a bit brighter and crunchier and lead a bit darker and smoother on the 120h.

Global boost, if it is like the big heads, is linear. So it is ok if you want a clean boost (i.e. all frequencies) but if you want a mid boost a TS or SD1 is still a better choice IMO.

Global tone is like a presence control on the 120h
Global dynamics is like a resonance control on the 120h.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
i have to agree on the tightness. Distortion channels are really tight, and it seems you cant do nothing to loosen it up a bit. Its not that I dont like this, after all I think the Ironheart aims the 5150 target group, but with control over tightness it would be more versatile.

moreover it seems that its usable at lowergain settings like gain at 1-3 for rock tones. clean channel is also good. although i cannot get it to sound tweed

dynamics control seems like it does nothing.

the EQ knobs that can be pulled out do make a subtle difference. Bass says deepens freq., Mid and Trebble shift freq.
 

Toshiro

....
Contributor
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
6,345
Reaction score
397
Location
Daytona Beach, FL
i have to agree on the tightness. Distortion channels are really tight, and it seems you cant do nothing to loosen it up a bit. Its not that I dont like this, after all I think the Ironheart aims the 5150 target group, but with control over tightness it would be more versatile.

moreover it seems that its usable at lowergain settings like gain at 1-3 for rock tones. clean channel is also good. although i cannot get it to sound tweed

dynamics control seems like it does nothing.

the EQ knobs that can be pulled out do make a subtle difference. Bass says deepens freq., Mid and Trebble shift freq.

On the full size IR head the Dynamics is like a resonance control, turning it up gives you a bigger looser low end. Dunno if it not working right or whatever there. :(

The pre-boost needed to stay under 3-4 on mine before it turned the amp into volume "pumping" mud. I stopped using the onboard boost completely about 2 days after I got the amp. :lol: It was an interesting feature, but real OD pedals are better, IMO.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
i hooked it up with an XLR cable to my interface. this way i can choose if cab simulation is on or off.

would anyone care for wave files, so as to use le cab with his/hers own impulses?

(update- usb driver is not ASIO, its called "samsung microphone" directX driver, with latency through the roof >100ms. good news is that you can monitor the amp without latency from the headphone output or through the DI xlr out)

and also for some reason i cannot get it to record dry and wet through the USB
 

Aztec

On a perennial quest
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
16
Location
Estonia
Great playing in that vid.

Too bad the DI output is after the preamp. I really don't want to use the built in USB to get a dry track...

It is true that you can't choose anything abouve 16bit for the USB driver, but for some reason Reaper still shows 24bit at the top right corner, has that something to do with reaper's settings or does it actually really record at 24bit?

And to that guy who said that it's impossible to get under 100ms with USB, I got 46ms, compared to the 33ms I get with my interface.
 

Orren

Industrial Metalhead
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
73
Reaction score
39
Location
Orange County, CA
Too bad the DI output is after the preamp. I really don't want to use the built in USB to get a dry track...

DI output is after the power section. Simon from Laney told me this at NAMM, and if you read the manual (available online for download) it shows that the DI is after the power section in the block diagram.

Orren
 

Aztec

On a perennial quest
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
16
Location
Estonia
DI output is after the power section. Simon from Laney told me this at NAMM, and if you read the manual (available online for download) it shows that the DI is after the power section in the block diagram.

Orren

Yes you are right, I had the cabinet emulator off when I listened to it in my DAW, that's why I got mixed up.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
how do you got it to go under 100ms?
at my default settings its at 180ms

and also how do you record the dry/wet signal ? i can get it to record via usb, but it looks like a mono track.
 

Orren

Industrial Metalhead
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
73
Reaction score
39
Location
Orange County, CA
how do you got it to go under 100ms?
at my default settings its at 180ms

I'm curious if anyone has a Mac what options you have in the drivers. I'd like to know if it's 16-bit/44.1kHz only or if you have more options than that.

Orren
 

Aztec

On a perennial quest
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
16
Location
Estonia
how do you got it to go under 100ms?
at my default settings its at 180ms

and also how do you record the dry/wet signal ? i can get it to record via usb, but it looks like a mono track.

Have you tried reducing the buffer size or a higher sample rate?

Arm two separate channels, one Input 1 and the other Input 2, the first one will be dry and the second one wet.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
aha. yes that works
but is seems the levels are very high and both channels are saturated and thus sound the same and ugly
 

Aztec

On a perennial quest
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
16
Location
Estonia
With my setup the dry level was perfect for me at about -12dBFS with the gain at 0 and you can control the wet level with the volume on the amp.

The sound itself was not the worst, but there's a lot of unwanted noise. Unless there is some sort of update, which I doubt, I probably wont be using the USB at all.
 

nowhere

ss.org irregular
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
151
Reaction score
3
Location
athens
could you share your settings with us ?
sample rate etc?

btw did you try recoding the preamp and using a cab sim in your daw?
 

Aztec

On a perennial quest
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
372
Reaction score
16
Location
Estonia
could you share your settings with us ?
sample rate etc?

btw did you try recoding the preamp and using a cab sim in your daw?

I just tried it once. I used 44.1kHz and 16bit (only one it allows) and the default buffer. I just wanted to hear it, didn't care about latency. Yes, I tried LeCab with a RedWirez mesa and it sounded ok, but as I said earlier it's just very noisy.
If you don't have an interface then I guess you can manage, but if you do then I'd rather use the DI out.
 
Top
')