Les paul ?

  • Thread starter lucifer666
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

lucifer666

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
65
Reaction score
1
Location
sweden/eskilstuna
hi quick question about les pauls i have seen some people pull the strings through the tail piece the other way and pulling them over the stopbar tail piece then to the tune o matic:scratch:why do they do that ? does it make any diffrens in sound o something ?
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Rook

Electrifying
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
9,055
Reaction score
1,457
Location
London
No, it just leaves nasty marks on the tailpiece and makes them more liable to breakages.

This should only be done on PRS Stoptails.
 

LLink2411

Banned
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
702
Reaction score
159
Location
City of Angels, Hell on Earth
Some people do it because it decreases the string break angle over the saddles and therefore usually keeps the strings in tune better over play wear. At least that is why you have to raise the tailpiece on Bigsbys if you want to use smaller gauges of strings.

If if changing the break angle of the strings actually makes a difference on guitars without Bigsbys, I have no idea.


The only person I know who does this is Billy from ZZ Top on his "Pearly Gates" Les Paul.
 

stuz719

Stoic. With a small "s".
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
1,452
Reaction score
357
Location
UK
The only person I know who does this is Billy from ZZ Top on his "Pearly Gates" Les Paul.

I think Joe Bonamassa does it, too.

To me it just sounds like yet another of those "you-get-better-tone-from-a-Duracell-than-an-Ever-Ready-when-you're-playing-through-a-cranked-100-watt-stack"-type myths.

:shrug:
 

MaxOfMetal

Likes trem wankery.
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
44,494
Reaction score
49,886
Location
Racine, WI
I think Joe Bonamassa does it, too.

To me it just sounds like yet another of those "you-get-better-tone-from-a-Duracell-than-an-Ever-Ready-when-you're-playing-through-a-cranked-100-watt-stack"-type myths.

:shrug:

:agreed:
 

Customisbetter

WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
Contributor
Joined
Jul 20, 2009
Messages
7,605
Reaction score
802
Location
Lansing, MI
OK how about some actual expirience. :lol:

I used to do this on some guitars with TOMs. I found some guitars the break angle was pretty intense, like on this SG standard at the time. Screwing the tailpiece all the way into the body seemed to add a touch of "oomph" to the guitar so i was always at odds with myself trying decide what i liked better, lower string break angle or more sustain. Wrapping the strings over the tailpiece allows you to get best of both worlds.

Keep in mind everything said here is EXTREMELY subjective. A lot of people will tell you there is NO difference in sustain with tailpiece height or slinkyness with break angle. However you need to try it for yourself to see.

Hope this helps.
 

Ckackley

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
874
Reaction score
70
Location
Martinsburg, WV
I tried it on my Les Paul ONCE. Didn't notice any huge difference and it scratched the shit out of my stopbar. lol
 

CFB

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
294
Reaction score
22
Location
Sweden
I do it all the time, it just feels better for my right hand. It will scratch up your tailpiece though so if you want to baby the guitar it's not the way to go. Tonally it makes no difference at all.
 

Miss D Corona

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
161
Reaction score
3
Location
Ireland
apparently it makes it easier to bend strings, but I'm not ruining my SG or Les Paul tail-piece to find out :)
 

Xk6m6m5X

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
1,169
Reaction score
435
Location
jersey
it does make bending easier...and call me crazy but it helped the sustain on mine:shrug:
 

Rook

Electrifying
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
9,055
Reaction score
1,457
Location
London
I'm not starting a big debate, this is a bit mythy for my taste, if someone can produce some evidence I'm there; this can go in the pile with £300 HDMI cables, "burning in" transistor amps and NOS tubes lol.

Ok I admit, I'm exaggerating, but I can't see it making any difference, it's just one of those things that seems a little 'placebo'.
 

Demiurge

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2005
Messages
5,815
Reaction score
4,013
Location
Worcester, MA
I do it, but it's kind of a habit thing. It decreases the break angle from stop-bar to bridge, but then again that hairpin angle around the tailpiece probably negates it.

Is it the most egregious act of tone voodoo? No, but I guess I'll keep doing it for no goddamned good reason.
 

Unknown Doodl3.2

look at each other..
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Messages
3,351
Reaction score
207
Location
Montreal
NOS tubes lol.

....

'placebo'.

You've never actually played NOS tubes have you? Mind you the market has gone nuts over certain brands/types (long plate Mullards for example) but they really DO make a difference, especially in older amps that were designed around these tubes. The feel is completely different; Not to mention Sylvania STR-415s or RCA blackplate 6L6s for example can last you up to 11-12,000 hours. Find me a production power tube that will last you that long before fainting/failing.
 

DesertBurst

need moar dorrar
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
141
Reaction score
48
Location
Minneapolis
^trve

I've tried some German made NOS tubes, and they are superior to chinese ones in every aspect.
 

Rook

Electrifying
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
9,055
Reaction score
1,457
Location
London
You've never actually played NOS tubes have you? Mind you the market has gone nuts over certain brands/types (long plate Mullards for example) but they really DO make a difference, especially in older amps that were designed around these tubes. The feel is completely different; Not to mention Sylvania STR-415s or RCA blackplate 6L6s for example can last you up to 11-12,000 hours. Find me a production power tube that will last you that long before fainting/failing.

I was purposely being a bit crass haha.

There are NOS tubes which I absolutely agree are great in the right amp, but a valve simply being NOS doesn't make it so.

My 'doesn't make a difference' comment was regarding the bridge. NOS is becoming one of those things that people write in any old tube an that people who don't know better associate with being good.

I think you either got the rhetoric of my comment or you didnt, it seems to be a British thing. To clarify for those who didn't, I was not denouncing NOS tubes lol.
 

Bloody_Inferno

Silence is Violence
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
14,053
Reaction score
7,338
Location
Melbourne, Australia
To me it just sounds like yet another of those "you-get-better-tone-from-a-Duracell-than-an-Ever-Ready-when-you're-playing-through-a-cranked-100-watt-stack"-type myths.

:shrug:

Pretty much this.

it does make bending easier...and call me crazy but it helped the sustain on mine:shrug:

This is supposed to be the main reason Billy Gibbons, Zakk Wylde and Joe Bonamasa do this due to the wraparound giving more tension IIRC. I did this on my LP Studio as well. I couldn't really tell much difference to be quite honest. Les Pauls are already known to have a good sustain anyway.

I've still kept it that way though... :ugh:
 
Top
')