Line 6 PODXT as interface?

  • Thread starter espmetalhead
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

espmetalhead

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Location
St. Louis, MO
Just picked up some Mackie MR5 monitors :hbang:

I have been using a Line 6 POD XT for home practice (can't use the stack in an apartment), and I usually practice by choosing the POD as the audio output from my Macbook and play guitar through the POD. As of now the monitors are hooked up to the balanced line outs on the POD using TRS to XLR cables

Would the audio quality of a dedicated interface be better quality for playback? (as in, run the POD into and interface and use the interface to as the output device?). I bought the Mackies because I wanted something better than computer speakers, as I open tracks in Logic that other musicians send me to record solo tracks on and send back. So far it seems to sound pretty damn good (haven't broken the monitors in yet), but you guys have more experience with studio stuff than I do I'm betting so any advice would be great.
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

mnemonic

Custom User Title
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
5,556
Reaction score
2,167
Location
Chester, UK
So playing guitar pod -> interface -> monitors? I would think this would degrade the sound quality further since you're going to need to use the POD's converters to go from POD to Interface, unless I'm reading things wrong.

For what its worth, I use my toneport for practice in the exact same way; monitors plugged into the outputs of the toneport. No sound quality issues.
 

espmetalhead

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Location
St. Louis, MO
So playing guitar pod -> interface -> monitors? I would think this would degrade the sound quality further since you're going to need to use the POD's converters to go from POD to Interface, unless I'm reading things wrong.

For what its worth, I use my toneport for practice in the exact same way; monitors plugged into the outputs of the toneport. No sound quality issues.


As of now, the signal chain is Guitar - > Pod XT - Monitors, the POD is hooked up USB to the computer and I have the audio out set to USB Pod XT. I wasn't sure if the audio processor made a difference in playback, it sounds pretty good though. I only use the monitors for listening to music and tracking guitar solo demo takes to send back to friends that have real studios (I go to their studio for the final track to play through a real rig). But I wanted regular playback of music to be as clear as possible. Your reply is what I was thinking, but wanted to make sure I had it right. Thanks :cool:
 

mnemonic

Custom User Title
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
5,556
Reaction score
2,167
Location
Chester, UK
For playing/practice, I don't think it would be any better to use an external interface, however if you're using the podXT as the soundcard for your computer for playback of everything else through the monitors, a dedicated interface may sound better, as I've seen a few people here do it.

Bulb even did it in his 'how to record' videos, he had an interface set up for playback of his recordings rather than go through his axe fx. Though if memory serves, I think he may have done it because there were more ins and outs on the interface so he could plug more stuff in at once.

That being said, I don't know how big of a difference it would really make. A friend back in college had some m-audio interface (i forget which) as well as a podXT and we A/B'd them and I couldn't hear any difference between them as an interface between the computer and monitors.
 

espmetalhead

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Location
St. Louis, MO
For playing/practice, I don't think it would be any better to use an external interface, however if you're using the podXT as the soundcard for your computer for playback of everything else through the monitors, a dedicated interface may sound better, as I've seen a few people here do it.

Bulb even did it in his 'how to record' videos, he had an interface set up for playback of his recordings rather than go through his axe fx. Though if memory serves, I think he may have done it because there were more ins and outs on the interface so he could plug more stuff in at once.

That being said, I don't know how big of a difference it would really make. A friend back in college had some m-audio interface (i forget which) as well as a podXT and we A/B'd them and I couldn't hear any difference between them as an interface between the computer and monitors.

Ok thanks, it will be used for playback. I sold home theater for years, and I know the different processing in those pre amps did effect sound quite a bit, but those were for 7 channel setups not un processed stereo stuff
 
Top