Mark V 25 or Revv G20 for bedroom recording

  • Thread starter Stiman
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Stiman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
699
Reaction score
869
Location
Canada
I'm slowly looking into getting a small tube head for bedroom playing and recording, and looking at these two, I'm curious how the CabClone in the Mark V head compares to the Two Notes Torpedo Captor in the G20 head. The thought of not needing to buy a load box is really appealing to me.

Anyone had input on one or both of these?
Thanks

Edit:
I would throw the Badlander 25 head into the mix as well. Doesn't change the question though, as it has the same CabClone that's the Mark V has (I believe).

I might also consider the Peavey Invective MH which has some kind of speaker emulated output. Although if it's not adjustable by swapping my own IR, then it might not be worth it.
 
Last edited:

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

budda

Do not criticize as this
Contributor
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
33,309
Reaction score
18,809
Location
Earth
So you do or dont plan to run a cab?

Buy an fm3, get those tones and more, plus effects and interface capability :2c:

It comes down to which amp you prefer the sound of as far as the real things go.
 

MASS DEFECT

SS.ORG Infiltrator
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
2,866
Reaction score
3,812
Location
San Francisco, California
The cabclone in the marv V25 is inferior to the cabclone IR that the badlander 25 has. The badlander is like having a torpedo x onboard. The mark v25 cabclone is just not as good.
I'm slowly looking into getting a small tube head for bedroom playing and recording, and looking at these two, I'm curious how the CabClone in the Mark V head compares to the Two Notes Torpedo Captor in the G20 head. The thought of not needing to buy a load box is really appealing to me.

Anyone had input on one or both of these?
Thanks

Edit:
I would throw the Badlander 25 head into the mix as well. Doesn't change the question though, as it has the same CabClone that's the Mark V has (I believe).

I might also consider the Peavey Invective MH which has some kind of speaker emulated output. Although if it's not adjustable by swapping my own IR, then it might not be worth it.
 

rifftrauma

Trapped in time...
Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2011
Messages
1,585
Reaction score
1,238
Location
Virginia
Figured I'd throw the Kemper out there as an option as well. I'm sure both amps are represented, and you can record direct into your DAW. You can also buy one with a built in power amp if you want to run it separately through FRFR or a cab, small footprint etc. :2c:
 

Grindspine

likes pointy things
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
2,465
Reaction score
1,971
Location
Indiana
The cabclone in the marv V25 is inferior to the cabclone IR that the badlander 25 has. The badlander is like having a torpedo x onboard. The mark v25 cabclone is just not as good.
Note that the Mark 5:35 has an upgrade to the CabClone too. The Mark 525 that I have only has open & closed speaker cab options. The Mark 535 has open, closed, or vintage.

The Revv G20 is an awesome little amp. A friend of mine has one and can pull some great Fear Factory sounds out of it.

I own a Mark 525 and do rather like the CabClone as an option. I typically record with a CabClone track and a close mic track (Shure SM-57 or KSM-313 ribbon). My tracks on Soundcloud were either Mark 525 direct or mixed direct with close mic.
Fractured and Burned to Ash is all Mark 525 cabclone.
Internal Screaming is Cabclone + close mic KSM-313 ribbon mic.
 

TheWarAgainstTime

"TWAT" for short
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
9,346
Reaction score
2,236
Location
Austin, TX
I haven't tried the Revv, but I owned a Mark V 25 and the Cab Clone sounded like hot garbage. It's a resistive load and analog filter, which isn't really representative of a real cabinet and mic signal. From what I can tell, the Two Notes stuff in the Revv is a reactive load and allows you to import your own IR files. That being said, I doubt the core tones of the amps are very similar, so it's still an apples-to-oranges comparison in that regard :2c:

Here are some clips of the 25 with both Cab Clone options as well as running through a Suhr Reactive Load and IR. There are also clips of my 90w Mark V running through the same load box/IR and a Helix Native patch with the same IR as well. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1f5WTB0auZzxSxBVy3ClHhJnh4FuDKa2M?usp=sharing

EDIT: reuploaded the clips to include a stereo delay on the lead and clean sections since the originals were collapsed to mono
 
Last edited:

ArtDecade

Way Cool Jr
Joined
Feb 27, 2009
Messages
8,634
Reaction score
13,708
Location
c.1987
Soldano Astro is the way. First, it is a Soldano. Second, you can run IRs right out the back (pre-loaded or your own). Third, it is its own load box. Finally, it is a Soldano.
 

Asdrael

Green and Blue stuff.
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Messages
599
Reaction score
765
Location
Germany
I have a Laney IRT studio and really like it. You can get a DI, dry and IR'd signal out. Has a 1W and 15W mode and sounds to me really good. Plus it can be bought for like 300€ used.
 

KnightBrolaire

Pickup Connoisseur
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
21,830
Reaction score
30,228
Location
Minnesota
The revv is going to be far more useful at lower volumes ime. They have excellent master volume tapers ime. Most of the Mark lineup have fucking awful master volume tapers ime.
If you're running them direct, then the Two Notes stuff is basically the standard for a reason (it's very good and pretty easy to use).

The smaller Marks are generally a bit harsher in the mids and high end than the bigger versions ime, though it can be dialed out to an extent.
 


Latest posts

Top
')