There are lots of mp3 encoders and encoding methods. By far, the best way way to encode mp3s is by using LAME with V2 or V0 preset. It's completely transparent in virtually every single scenario. The whole "mp3 sucks" thing is a huge myth dating back to late 90s and early 00s, when mp3 were indeed pretty lousy due to hardware limitations and slow internet. PCs at the time just couldn't handle good and fast lossy encoding and playback, and of course, p2p played a huge role in mp3s popularity, which is why bitrates of 128 or even 96 were preferred due to crappy internet speed. Nowadays we can easily achieve transparency, but the myth carries on.
Perception of sound is very individual though, we should always remember that
![Agreed :agreed: :agreed:](http://www.sevenstring.org/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/agreed.gif)
V0 is not enough for me, I do FLAC for two reasons, sound quality and I cut and mix and process some music and like it lossless to not lose quality between operations.
However, I can (and many with me) abx most of the stuff I listen to, V2 and V0 vs FLAC, the only mp3 compression that works for me is cbr320 with one of the later LAME (3.98b and forward).
V0 is enough most of the time but with some very dynamic hi-fi music the cut-off algorithm isn't enough, however for me, cbr320 is as friggin transparent as can be, my library on my laptop (which is for listening while I travel) is all cbr320 and I couldn't ever tell the difference from FLAC (and if I ever did it was probably just placebo)
![lol :lol: :lol:](http://www.sevenstring.org/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.gif)
It is totally a myth that a well coded mp3 nowadays is of bad quality.
---
Anyway, I love this album, so catchy, so good. I have no problem with the production, as Zimbloth said, I never went to Nile for crystal clear production
![lol :lol: :lol:](http://www.sevenstring.org/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.gif)
Either way, sooo catchy. Love it!