Ns-2 and decimator comparison

  • Thread starter danenachtrieb
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

danenachtrieb

TheGuiltyUnpunished
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
551
Reaction score
137
Location
Wentzville, MO
how musch do they differ? i got the ns-2 and i heard the decimator slays it. so how big is the difference? is it worth me ditching the ns-2 for the decimator?:scratch:
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Petef2007

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Messages
755
Reaction score
150
Location
Sheffield, UK
If you have the money i'd say go for it. The NS2 is good if you're on a budget, and i find it doesn't affect tone/sustain one bit if used right, but the decimator is in a whole other league. Completely transparent, and cuts out any and all unwanted noise, whereas the NS2 i find cuts out *most* of it, but not all of it.
 

BurialWithin

NAM SAND!!
Joined
Sep 14, 2008
Messages
996
Reaction score
61
Location
Horn Lake, MS.
Yeah the ns-2 gets the job done i have one and it works for me . If i was to get anything else i'd get the decimator rack unit cuz those things are it fa sho !!
 

Scoop_89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
281
Reaction score
6
Location
Sweden
I haven't tried either of the two but from what I've gathered the NS-2 adds some compression that can be preffered by some.
 

Petef2007

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2007
Messages
755
Reaction score
150
Location
Sheffield, UK
^ aye, from my experience, it only adds a very slight bit of compression, which can be easily dialled out if it isn't wanted.
 

adadglgmut

Notes from a Ghost
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
351
Reaction score
8
Location
Edmonton
my other guitarist is using the ns-2 and it indeed does add compression. not obscene
over the top compression, but its hard to get rid of.
i like my decimator waaaay more for high gain applications because it does what its supposed to.
cuts all unwanted noise.
all of it.
and it works for a huge range of pickups/amp settings.
 

I_infect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
1,295
Reaction score
187
Location
PA USA
I'm for ISP all the way. I tried the NS2, and returned it. It's ok for a gate, but the ISP reduces noise. Different. When a gate is open, it usually lets all of the signal through, including the noise. The ISP is like a gate if you crank it enough, but it's more of a noise filter, if you will.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,756
Location
Maryland
I think a lot of that decimater stuff is hype. The NS-2 works just fine..doesn't cut off notes, doesn't kill sustain..and kills feedback and unwanted noise
 

Brewtal_Damage

Heavy Noise
Joined
Dec 1, 2007
Messages
297
Reaction score
12
Location
Puerto Rico
I think a lot of that decimater stuff is hype. The NS-2 works just fine..doesn't cut off notes, doesn't kill sustain..and kills feedback and unwanted noise

believe me, it's not all hype, IMO it works better than the NS-2, but then again, I didn't got too much time with the NS-2 to make a experienced judgement, the way I use it it works amazingly for me.:yesway:
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,756
Location
Maryland
believe me, it's not all hype, IMO it works better than the NS-2, but then again, I didn't got too much time with the NS-2 to make a experienced judgement, the way I use it it works amazingly for me.:yesway:

All? No...a good amount? Yes. I'm sure on some level it may outperform the NS-2..but if you have an NS-2..it's not really worth spending more cash for the decimator
 

ryzorzen

shake and bake!
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Messages
383
Reaction score
27
Location
Ontario, Canada
pretty much, you get what you pay for. the ns-2 is widely popular and is in a lot of pro rigs, so it's obviously a preference as well. the decimator is a lot better in getting rid of exactly what you want with relative ease, whereas the ns-2 takes some tinkering. i would keep the ns-2 and invest in some durable cables, which can make a huge difference on the noise at the source.
 

poopyalligator

Dr.Poopyalligator
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
4,648
Reaction score
332
Location
"Albuquerque, NM"
ISP for the win. It is one of the best pieces of music equipment that i own. It has never let me down, it works super easily and super well. It is built like a tank. I never play a show without it.
 

Harry

Doom man of Doom.
Contributor
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Messages
8,250
Reaction score
744
Location
Melbourne, Aus
I had the Behringer pedal that's a clone of the NS-2.
It did cut a tiny bit of sustain and add compression, but it got rid of the feedback, cut down the noise a lot and did the job. I honestly could barely tell the difference between it and the real deal Boss pedal. Although that said, the plastic casing on the Behringer didn't exactly inspire confidence. Go with the Boss at least.
 

petereanima

Br00tal Bubbly Mofo
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
5,059
Reaction score
773
Location
Austria
i switched from NS-2 to ISP some time ago, and we tried it with some amps (back then my old marshall, my actual Diezel as well as the amps of my other gutiarist, which are Mesa DR and Laboga Mr. Hector) - my opinion on this is:

it all depends on your amp. if you have an amp with a good low end, you will soon notice that the NS-2 cuts a lot of it and adds some compression, also - per MY experience ( i had two NS2s over the years, both worked the same way) i found the Boss only be useable with very extreme settings, and then it DOES take a serious amount of sustain away - i noticed it on longer slides or single notes (and no, my attack isnt that bad :D ).

on the other side: it is perfect if you use insane amounts of gain and play stop/go/stop/go deep palm mute chuggah-chuggah ala meshuggah or something, as it really closes immediately.

the ISP works much smoother, which fits my style more - also it doesnt cut the low end and does not add compression as the NS-2. much ore transparent than the Boss, i prefer it.
 

I_infect

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
1,295
Reaction score
187
Location
PA USA
I think a lot of that decimater stuff is hype. The NS-2 works just fine..doesn't cut off notes, doesn't kill sustain..and kills feedback and unwanted noise

I'm sure the NS-2 works fine in some situations, but in mine it wasn't effective. It is not all hype, believe me... I have radio towers near me, and a loud humming transformer from the '60s 3 houses down the street, so my area is saturated with magnetic and radio interference. When I plug in, especially with active pickups, there is very loud humming and static. I bought a shit-ton of gear trying to eliminate it(boss ns-2,monster power 3500, etc) nothing worked until I spent the money on the ISP. All I got was the pedal, and my guitar is clean when I am playing and not, where with the Ns-2 it was quiet closed, while playing it was just as filthy.

ISP for the win. It is one of the best pieces of music equipment that i own. It has never let me down, it works super easily and super well. It is built like a tank. I never play a show without it.

:agreed:Out of all the gear I own, I am so 100% satisfied with it, I can't even whine about the price.
 

Sroth Saraiel

BC Rich 7 Strings :)
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
390
Reaction score
78
Location
Costa Rica
but guys what's the difference from the Decimator pedal, the Decimator G String pedal, and the Rack?
 

stuh84

The Viking himself
Contributor
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
3,915
Reaction score
341
Location
Sheffield, UK
I think a lot of that decimater stuff is hype. The NS-2 works just fine..doesn't cut off notes, doesn't kill sustain..and kills feedback and unwanted noise

Tried an NS2 and a Decimator side by side?

Me and Pete have on his VHT. The NS2 kind of worked. The ISP worked. Nothing more to it. Pete is now not using the NS2 as it did nothing for the Sig X, and will be getting a Decimator because it did :)

but guys what's the difference from the Decimator pedal, the Decimator G String pedal, and the Rack?

Between the G String and Rack, there isn't a lot of difference between them, besides enclosure, plus a couple of extra features which aren't stricly necessary.

Between the G String/Rack and the standard Pedal, the pedal just acts as a simple gating device, in that it allows sound above a certain threshold through, based upon where its plugged in (either in front of the amp, or in the effects loop). This is great for most purposes, however it does mean if you use it in the effects loop, anything that the preamp adds in terms of noise may leave the gate open, even if the guitar has stopped.

The G-String/Rack has an Input and Output, and a Send Return section. What this means is, you can plug the guitar into the Input/Output section, and it goes into the input of the amp. Plug the effects loop of your amp into the Send Return section, and then whenever the guitar stops playing, it mutes the signal in the effects loop, not before the amp. This means it is not affected by preamp noise or anything within the amp, ONLY what the guitar plays.
 

hairychris

Hairy Old Bloke
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
303
Location
London, UK
i found the Boss only be useable with very extreme settings, and then it DOES take a serious amount of sustain away - i noticed it on longer slides or single notes (and no, my attack isnt that bad :D ).

on the other side: it is perfect if you use insane amounts of gain and play stop/go/stop/go deep palm mute chuggah-chuggah ala meshuggah or something, as it really closes immediately.

I agree with this, having used an NS-2 since 93. Balance the sensitivity with a quick cut-off and you've got instant palm mute mayhem.

High output pickups, I think, confuse this box.

I still like it though!
 

Natron808

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
Location
Philadelphia, PA
The G-String/Rack has an Input and Output, and a Send Return section. What this means is, you can plug the guitar into the Input/Output section, and it goes into the input of the amp. Plug the effects loop of your amp into the Send Return section, and then whenever the guitar stops playing, it mutes the signal in the effects loop, not before the amp. This means it is not affected by preamp noise or anything within the amp, ONLY what the guitar plays.

The NS-2 also has a Send/Return section. Have the people here who own or have used them using that portion of it or just the simple input/output method? I'd really be curious to see how well it works against the standard ISP Decimator pedal when used with the Send/Return feature since the Decimator does not have that.

It's starting to occur to me that I simply need to finally pick up a Decimator G-String or the Decimator rack unit. I've been fighting noise and hum and interference for years. They're difficult to find used, though.
 
Top
')