This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I am probably going to get the Peavey 6505. As this would be my first valve amp then i can only compare it to what i have already, a marshall MGDFX250 with an eq and uber metal pedal in front. So i would probably think the valve amp is ten times better. In time when i have listened to/played many valve amps then i would be able to make a better discision. It will do for now, lol.
Do yourself a favor and pick up a Tung Sol 12AX7 for V1, and an overdrive pedal. Pick up a Bloody Murder from Joe, or if you don't have that much money, a used TS7, and send it to him to mod when you have more cash. I can't stress enough how important that overdrive pedal is.
The shared eq (which -in my opinion- is one of the nicest eq's to work with btw)
Get the 5150 (6505) it stomps all over the powerball imho. It's way more agressive, thick, in your face, unpolished, it has loads of RAW power to it.
The shared eq (which -in my opinion- is one of the nicest eq's to work with btw) isn't that much of a problem, I quite like it, the tone of the clean channel matches the one of the lead channel really good this way. If u play some clean passages the clean on the 5150 will be just fine. Btw, the powerball's clean isn't that great either.... yes, it's really clean but also cold, lifeless and sterile. I would pick the 5150 over the powerball anyday of the week in about every setting.
Engl > 6505. If you're going down the Peavey route, get a real 5150.![]()
Dude the 5150 and 6505 are identical. Come on man![]()
The cleans on my old 5150 were god awful at stage volume and I love my powerball cleans.
Thought the kid was referencing to the 5150 II/6505+.![]()
Peavey.com said:* 120 watts (rms) into 16, 8, or 4 ohms (switchable)
* Five 12AX7 preamp tubes and four 6L6GC power amp tubes
* High and low gain inputs
* 2-channel preamp switchable on front panel or remote footswitch
* Rhythm channel: pre-/post-gain, bright and crunch switches
* Lead channel: pre-/post-gain
* Channels share 3-band EQ
* Presence and resonance controls
* Switchable post-EQ effects loop
* Preamp output
* Footswitch included
* Weight Unpacked: 48
* Width Unpacked: 26.5
* Depth Unpacked: 11.875
* Height Unpacked: 10.25
* Weight Packed: 55
* Width Packed: 28.5
* Depth Packed: 14
* Height Packed: 12.25
Not sure if that means lbs or kg's, but I'd assume lb's since Americans insist in using stupid weight standards.![]()
I just don't understand why we havn't switched to the metric system yet.![]()
Hmmm... Yeah, It's a little lighter. The B52 is a monster to carry. And yeah, our measurement system sucks...
While the metric system is MUCH easier to interpret (especially true for anyone who has ever sifted through a drawer full of sockets and wrenches...) I think there are too many idiots in this country to make a smooth transition. Plus just how many cars are on the road today with MPH only?
While the metric system is MUCH easier to interpret (especially true for anyone who has ever sifted through a drawer full of sockets and wrenches...) I think there are too many idiots in this country to make a smooth transition.
Should just get the 6505 rather than the 6505+. The reason i was thinking about getting the + model was because it allows eq control on lead and rhythm channels. But as there isn't really a clean channel then i could just use the volume pot on my guitar to get a clean tone on the less ditorted channel. I would save a few hundred £'s, if i got the 6505.