YngwieJ
Well-Known Member
Nothing in the debate really surprised me. Both bent the truth to a fair extent. I wasn't really happy with Romney's answer on the assault weapons ban, and I believe he even said that the US has a ban on assault weapons. But as far as I know, that ban expired back in 2004 and was never renewed (correct me if I'm wrong).
Obama completely dodged the question on Libya security and talked about what the administration did after the attack and I was really surprised that Romney didn't address the security issues before the attack. Instead they both ended up arguing over whether Obama called it a terrorist attack or not, and that took far too long. Romney had a huge chance in the Libya discussion and he missed out. As most pundits are saying, this was really the turning point in the debate and I'd agree.
The debates are really nothing more than a bunch of empty rhetoric and neither candidate will pursue or keep all of the promises that they claim in these debates, so it's really upsetting that many undecided voters make up their minds based on what they hear and see in the debates. I think the League of Women Voters summed it up pretty well in 1988:
Obama completely dodged the question on Libya security and talked about what the administration did after the attack and I was really surprised that Romney didn't address the security issues before the attack. Instead they both ended up arguing over whether Obama called it a terrorist attack or not, and that took far too long. Romney had a huge chance in the Libya discussion and he missed out. As most pundits are saying, this was really the turning point in the debate and I'd agree.
The debates are really nothing more than a bunch of empty rhetoric and neither candidate will pursue or keep all of the promises that they claim in these debates, so it's really upsetting that many undecided voters make up their minds based on what they hear and see in the debates. I think the League of Women Voters summed it up pretty well in 1988:
League Refuses to "Help Perpetrate a Fraud" | League of Women Voters"The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions. The League has no intention of becoming an accessory to the hoodwinking of the American public."