Drew
Forum MVP
Not sure whether anyone 'won' at answering the guy's question.... unless there is some sort of latent bravado award up for grabs?
What, latent bravado in being able to play your own damned parts?
![lol :lol: :lol:](http://www.sevenstring.org/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/laugh.gif)
Not sure whether anyone 'won' at answering the guy's question.... unless there is some sort of latent bravado award up for grabs?
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I don't think you're giving these musicians enough credit. Food for thought. I can't say for certain that track wasn't edited in production to tighten it up, but it would surprise me.The thing is, although these players are absolutely amazing, what ends up in the final recording is DEFINITELY not what they just record straight off (and I'm talking about more than just eq'ing). Editing does take place. You can just tell by how it sounds.
Some editing may occur, yes, but what the players play (at least, the players of that caliber) is actually pretty damned close to what you hear. Their music may be incredibly rhythmically complex, yes, but Thorendal for example has spent decades practicing those complex rhythms, and is a VERY tight player for it.
Editing will make a performance sound a little tighter, but if it doesn't sound pretty good before you start, then you should go back and re-record.
As soon as I read "djent is incredibly complex" as an excuse for editing everything to pieces I knew this thread would make me want to kill myself.
Just play tighter. Watch J-browne.
Quad-tracking is effectively the reason why most big producers actually do sync transients on complex tracks to retain tightness. I see these things as going hand-in-hand.
I would agree that there should be no need to edit this way with only single or double tracked rhythm parts if the playing is tight, but quad tracking is another story to get right sometimes...
Oh c'mon, haha.
First and foremost, maybe I should've been clearer. I'm not talking about "editing everything to pieces." I'm talking about giving things that "over-produced" almost "robotic" kind of sound.
That's what I'm (and a lot producers) are going for with this stuff.
...and the day that sound goes away, I'll die a happy man.
But, gate the shit out of your guitar. A lot of that sound seems less to be heavy-handed editing than a gate slamming down aggressively and making the guitar go from almost full sustain to dead silence in a millisecond, so it osunds like something is getting sucked out of the room.
Listening to your clip, your biggest problem (aside from the djent influence) isn't tightness or gating or anything like that, it's that your guitars are just WAY too dark and muddy and indistinct for this sound. I'll assume this is an AxeFX rather than a real amp - dial back some of that low end and maybe try a more aggressive mic/speaker impulse. If you can't get a guitar to sound good through a SM57 close-mic'd, you're doing something wrong - I'd start there.
Without reading everything up above, yeah - your playing does sound pretty tight. It was hard to tell from the OP to what extent you were talking. Could've easily been a noob denying that tech bands even play remotely tightly haha.
In answer to your question - yeah, all the advice you need is here now.
As for "answering" questions, I feel like this might actually be it! Haha
So this is what "the pros" do? Sync transients by hand?
I quad track a lot of stuff. That was one of my original points. Getting the four to align 100% is virtually impossible.
If there's no shortcut, per se, then this is it.