G_3_3_k_
Probably diddling an Oni
It's funny how two different players can have such different perspectives on guitars. I don't think that lower priced are toys at all, in fact generally I just see them as the same thing as high priced guitars made by foreign luthiers with worse parts. But I'm not like, a collecter kind of dude, I am a player. I just want them made dimensionally correct, I'll take care of the rest if need be. Rarely do I see a major brand offering a cheap guitar that is dimensionally and fundamentally made incorrectly, at least to the degree that I see here.
The Legator was made wrong, and is mechanically unsalvagable.
I understand. And if you don't mind the differences, thats great. To me, in the case of a $200 guitar, if it plays ok, and sounds halfway decent, you got lucky. You could absolutely salvage the pickup cavity with a wood block cut to the right dimensions and use dowels to plug the mount holes on the bridge and re-route and re drill the guitar to get the geometry right and give it a good fret dressing. There will be some irregularities in the finish because of it. But what would you rather have? Good finish or a guitar that plays right? If the wood is decent quality, it would absolutely be worth the time to salvage the guitar. Toss some good pickups in it and you'd have a good player for less than buying one off the shelf. I generally don't buy from companies that exploit laborers or set unrealistic standards for the price of a guitar. So I don't buy from the big names generally for that reason. I don't run into many guitars that do have crazy issues anymore because of it.