So...Why do People Hate on Gibson and Fender Again?

  • Thread starter Church2224
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

magarishun

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
Vienna, AT
@MaxOfMetal
Some was satire, some was because because that guitar makes no sense to me, and my experience with people who want to talk about Epi Dots have never been great.

I'll admit that those are all very valid points and answers to my questions. I was thinking all of that as I was typing, but I really don't understand or like that guitar. Give me a 175 or 295 any day, or a chambered LP.

Apologies for the rant, I needed to get that 335 hate of my chest. Almost certainly irrational hate, and it's great that no one's forcing me to buy one.
you should listen to some chuck berry, BB king or cream 335 clapton stuff

that should get the GAS going ;)
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Rap Hat

the:pawn.project
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Messages
648
Reaction score
111
Location
Danbury, CT
Hell, get a 330 if you want a true hollowbody!

I'm majorly gassing for a 335 though. I love my 330 don't get me wrong, but every time I look at Gibsons I think how cool it would be to use one for metal and not have to worry about insane feedback.
 

Grand Moff Tim

Some call me... Tim
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
7,345
Reaction score
1,561
Location
IL
I've got a Hamer 335 clone back in the States that I absolutely love, and it was my guitar of choice in the last black metal band I played guitar in. I'd love to have a legit 335, but Gibsons tend towards the "...as a motherfucker" side of expensive here in Korea. The shop where I bought my Epi LPC had a satin black 335, and they were asking what came out to damned near three grand for it. Nope.
 

Murmel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Messages
4,153
Reaction score
307
Location
Sweden
I think the 339/336 is what the 335 should have been from the start. Or the 390. If you want a smaller jazz guitar, why would you keep it so wide?
I actually really like that they kept it wide. It looks good (I think the smaller Gibson semi-hollows look pretty weird), and my arm feels perfect resting on the bigger body. More perfect than on any other guitar.

I'm still to get an ES335 though :lol:
 

flexkill

Vodka & PentaTonic
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
2,835
Reaction score
288
Location
Nashville, USA
I will never forget the first time I played a 335 many years ago when I was a kid. I was all "fuck this grandpa guitar shit" Then I plugged it in an.....WOW! I had no idea...and now I do.

Thing sounded killer and what really surprised me was how rock n roll it was with gain. Killer killer guitars.:metal:
 

HeHasTheJazzHands

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
37,453
Reaction score
31,219
Location
Louisiana
Gibson and fender are good but not that good if ur a metal guy

No.

Brent-Hinds-and-Bill-Kelliher-pic.jpg


Tony-Iommi_3-display.jpg

jim_root_at_london_gig_by_little_miss_synful-d31vkiy.jpg

l.jpg
3395-29.jpg

tumblr_lq4y8fgblU1qmm47qo1_500.jpg
 
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
1,293
Reaction score
985
Location
Barrie, ON
For me, the reason why I hate Fender and Gibson guitars so much is due to several reason. The first being they both have fat necks with a clear coat on them. It just doesn't feel natural and since my hands get sweaty, my left hand either sticks or slips around too much on them. The second being is because I find that Fender and Gibson are one trick ponies. They've had the same sound since the dawn of time and they just don't give me the flexibility or versatility of a brand like Ibanez. It's just to me, all Fenders sound the same and all Gibsons sound the same, whereas the different models of Ibanez guitars all have different characteristics.
 

MaxOfMetal

Likes trem wankery.
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
44,503
Reaction score
50,016
Location
Racine, WI
The first being they both have fat necks

That's simply not true. A Fender Modern C/D and a Gibson 60's are very close in dimensions to many Ibanez and Jackson guitars. I'm sitting here with my UV7 and Les Paul Traditional, and the necks, while certainly different, are both very playable. Now, my old Broadcaster reissue had a GIANT neck. :lol:

with a clear coat on them.

Just like every Ibanez (well, minus those with neck backs which are finished to the body color) that leaves the factory. Two of my three LPs have satin finished necks. Fender does do satin finishes on the necks as well. Not ever model, but a lot of them.

The second being is because I find that Fender and Gibson are one trick ponies.

Both of these guitars are stock:





These are another pair:





They've had the same sound since the dawn of time and they just don't give me the flexibility or versatility of a brand like Ibanez.

See above. I love Ibanez too, but that's because 95% of my RGs have sounded exactly the same. :lol:

It's just to me, all Fenders sound the same and all Gibsons sound the same, whereas the different models of Ibanez guitars all have different characteristics.

You can't say that a Telecaster and a Jazzmaster sound at all the same, or a Les Paul Deluxe and an SG Custom. The only thing those guitars share, for the most part, is the name on the headstock. :lol:
 

Basti

not much space to wr
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
55
Location
Uddersfield UK
Because you look at all the customs, sevens and ERG guitar porn on here and you're just like...I WANT MORE.
 

Grand Moff Tim

Some call me... Tim
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
7,345
Reaction score
1,561
Location
IL
Gibson is too busy supporting Guitar Center and Musicians Friend with lower grade guitars for the masses that they have diluted the company to a point where they are turning out shit.

Boy, Gibson just can't win there, can they? Either all their stuff is overpriced, or their affordable guitars are diluting the company.

Anything worth a damn from Gibson will come from the Custom Shop by a master luthier, but it is all show.

I love my Buckethead LP Studio :shrug:

And, they are too busy suing luthiers like Gil Yaron, Ken McKay and others for reproducing period correct replicas. Instead of suing, they should license these guys.

Nothing wrong with protecting a company's interests. I honestly don't know if Gibson licenses out their ideas or not, though. Have those guys tried to obtain the right to build reproductions legally, or did they just build unlicensed reproductions and then get a letter from mean ol' Gibson?
 

MaxOfMetal

Likes trem wankery.
Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
44,503
Reaction score
50,016
Location
Racine, WI
I can't speak for Fender, but Gibson is too busy supporting Guitar Center and Musicians Friend with lower grade guitars for the masses that they have diluted the company to a point where they are turning out shit. Anything worth a damn from Gibson will come from the Custom Shop by a master luthier, but it is all show. And, they are too busy suing luthiers like Gil Yaron, Ken McKay and others for reproducing period correct replicas. Instead of suing, they should license these guys.

Have you played any of the 2013 stuff? I used to shit all over the Special and Faded models, because they really were pretty mediocre, but it seems that Gibson has REALLY upped their game in the $800 to $1500 bracket. The bodies are no longer 3+ pieces, the fretboards are wonderfully put together, the fretwork is on par with their $2500 range, the hardware is solid, and the finish and dress options are very abundant.

I know GC and SA stock tons of them (last GC I went to have roughly a dozen or so T, J, and Tribute models. It's like night and day.

As for Gibson licensing, or in this case the refusal of, that's Gibson's right. It's not their fault that some builders rather profiteer of them than innovate on their own. If this was a small builder suing the big guy, would you really have the same issue?
 

Don Vito

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
5,314
Reaction score
225
Location
L O N D O N
Boy, Gibson just can't win there, can they? Either all their stuff is overpriced, or their affordable guitars are diluting the company.
This:lol:

Their cheap stuff isn't even that bad. My step dad's 09 Satin LP Studio is one of the best under 1k guitars I've ever played.

Compared to other guitars around that price, the craftsmanship is similar(not gonna lie), but the Gibsons have a warmer and more distinguishable tone IMO.
 

Curt

Where we're going we don't need neck pickups.
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
2,972
Reaction score
290
Location
The Neverend
Because you look at all the customs, sevens and ERG guitar porn on here and you're just like...I WANT MORE.
If Gibson would just do some maple fretboard, solid color, baritone Explorers... I wouldn't be looking into customs. :lol:
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
3,835
Reaction score
774
Location
MS, USA
So let's review some of the obviously well-thought-out and impartial reasons given for why Gibson and Fender suck...

1. They can't do metal.
2. Their reasonably priced guitars are poorly built.
3. Their well built guitars are too expensive.
4. Their necks are too fat.
5. They are one trick ponies.
6. They all sound the same.
7. They're old and outdated.
8. The ES-335 sucks.
9. They sue people who copy their designs.

Man, you guys give such good arguments. I have to thank some the well-educated users here for setting me straight. I can't believe I was such a fan of Gibson and Fender all these years and never realized they actually were horrible.

/sarcasm :rolleyes:
 
Top
')