mongey
Well-Known Member
thinks its too early to start a thread but watched ep 1 of west world
thought it was an interesting start . looking forward to more
thought it was an interesting start . looking forward to more
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Watched the first 3 episodes of Atlanta. Damn good. A simple show, but very well written so far.
The new American Horror Story season (I believe the full title is AHS: Knockout Game or at least I'll be calling it that) premiered last night. I suppose I'm again starting a cycle consisting of "Hmmm... this might be neat", followed by "Holy crap, that's nuts", followed by "Ugh, I'm too far along to stop", ending in "Welp, that happened".
My guess is that the producers of the show read Head Full of Ghosts and decided, "Let's try that!" The faux reality/documentary show as framing device with a clear unreliable narrator element with a-little-too-on-the-nose-even-for-AHS borrowings from other horror properties is interesting, but I read that book at the beach this summer, too.
The show is so bad. They have no idea how horror works. I try with every series, and wait, and wait... and then nothing. The second series was compelling, everything else, just terrible.
Why do I keep coming back?
Yup, and we're at episode 5 and coherence-Defcon 2. Kathy Bates with a hilariously-inscrutable accent, random "J-Horror"-style ghost, Cuba Gooding Jr. givin' it to Lady Gaga from behind, and a very precise "die here and become an instant ghost" metaphysics.
Why do I keep coming back? It seems like there's nothing legitimately scary (in a thrilling sense) any more on TV, as every show that attempts the genre tries to cut it with a certain amount of camp. Here, there's just no cap on the camp, and a premise of plumbing a diversity of horror tropes, urban legends, etc. gets drowned in cheese. Then, the spectacle becomes seeing how it happens... which makes the viewing experience event trashier that may even be the intent in the first place![]()
Finally finished Luke Cage. Good stuff on its own right and very entertaining through and through, but I felt a bit disappointed coming from Daredevil and Jessica Jones. Normally I'd take the show at face value, but given its direct connection with the other two and the fact that it makes so many explicit references to them, it begs for a direct comparison. I'd recommend it to anyone as well, but I'd also add that they should lower their expectations a bit; DD and JJ were quite different.
I've never been sure if Bates is producing some obscure, never-before-seen-on-TV, accent, or total gibberish. I'm nearly at my final verdict though...
Granted that this stuff is entirely subjective, and that you're totally entitled to your disappointment..
Though I readily agree that DD, JJ, and LC are each different from each other, I wouldn't say any are inherently better than the others. I'd argue that all three have been equally well-written/casted/directed/acted/edited. What separates each (to me) isn't quality, but style/tone.
LC is in Harlem. In or out of canon, that's an entirely different history than Hell's Kitchen, so it makes total sense that LC would have a different feel even though DD and JJ feel a little more similar.
I don't know enough about the character to know what part of the city Iron Fist will be in, but I'm guessing it'll have a slightly different feel, too.
I've primarily seen really negative reviews about Luke Cage after the initial wave of "it's good [cause he's black]" articles (of which there were many). I guess it's really boring, Luke Cage himself is far less interesting than he was on JJ, and the villain is about as threatening as your average gangster? I dunno. I haven't watched a single one of those Marvel shows. I started Daredevil once and lost interest after less than one episode. I sorta want to see the Punisher cause everyone says he's great, but that's a whole season in!!