Tonedeaf Test

  • Thread starter jaredowty
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

darren

Forum MVP
Joined
Oct 18, 2004
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
1,349
I got 83.3%, but could have done better had i not been listening on my laptop's built-in speakers.
 

nikt

LACS Lover
Joined
May 22, 2005
Messages
2,325
Reaction score
736
Location
Poland,Wroclaw
72.2% and never trained my ears so this is not bad. But I see I will have to start now working on it.

cool test
 
D

Desecrated

im very sorry to inform you, but this is a test to see if people can easily be manipulated. not the check the "tonedef"factor.
 

jjjsssxxx

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
241
Reaction score
25
80.6%

eh, just kinda wanted it to be over about half way through
 

Nik

Arrogant asshole
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
3,248
Reaction score
89
Location
My house
I got 83.3%

This seems to be more of a memory test than a tone-deafness test. Some of the phrases were pretty long and difficult to remember. I think you should get at least 1 or 2 replays.

EDIT: This one's better:

http://tonometric.com/adaptivepitch/
 

Hellbound

€£¥€£¥€£¥€£•
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
95
Location
In the dark side of my mind
tried it again this morning 88.9.....beat dat bitches!!:cool:


um I got "at 500 hz you can differentiate two tones 2.1hz apart.


I have no idea if that is good or bad.lol
 

DelfinoPie

Whoopsie Daisy!
Contributor
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
3,591
Reaction score
445
Location
Birmingham, UK
I did the second test posted and got 80.6%, not bad considering I have no musical training and have never ever done any ear-training lol.
 

Mastodon

Songs about My Cats
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
6,698
Reaction score
261
Location
Bizurke
We had a thread on this before, and as mentioned by Desecrated this is not really a tone deaf test.
 

Nik

Arrogant asshole
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
3,248
Reaction score
89
Location
My house
I could hear within 1.05hz. Not too shabby.

Damn dude, that's pretty good :metal:

I got around 1.6 hz. I'm borderline awesome :lol: (anything below 1.5 is really really good).

I think that this is one of those things where you can actually train your ears and get better at it.
 

mefrommiddleearth

the abominabal poop
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
475
Reaction score
15
Location
christchurch new zealand
at 500hz I can reliably differentiate two tones 5.7 hz apart
and I got 83 on the test (the one posted by nik)
considering I have no musical ear training I feel pretty good about that
 

SnowfaLL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,636
Reaction score
742
Location
Halifax NS
This is definately a tone test, not a memory test, because it makes you hear the "hidden" notes that some people cant make out easily, While someone with a highly developed ear can get 10 notes in the phrase, someone with a worse ear may only hear 8 notes..

I got like 91.7% or something like that.. screenshot was on the other thread of this.. One dude on here, forget who though someone got 98% from here wasnt it? Didn't do the second one yet but I will when I have more time
 

Mastodon

Songs about My Cats
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
6,698
Reaction score
261
Location
Bizurke
This is definately a tone test, not a memory test, because it makes you hear the "hidden" notes that some people cant make out easily, While someone with a highly developed ear can get 10 notes in the phrase, someone with a worse ear may only hear 8 notes..

I got like 91.7% or something like that.. screenshot was on the other thread of this.. One dude on here, forget who though someone got 98% from here wasnt it? Didn't do the second one yet but I will when I have more time

I was referring to this one:http://jakemandell.com/tonedeaf/
 
Top
')