Shask
Well-Known Member
I prefer to keep my wrists straight over looking stupid, lol.Yikes. Yeah I'm not fond of wearing my guitar as a bow tie
I prefer to keep my wrists straight over looking stupid, lol.Yikes. Yeah I'm not fond of wearing my guitar as a bow tie
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
I just love everyone's "unique" guitar height style!I prefer to keep my wrists straight over looking stupid, lol.
Tom Morello style here, lol.
Whatever brings the chugs and weedles!I need a chin cut for my guitars. Proper wrist position ftw.
She's the fucking best lmao
Okay, I have a real opinion kind of...
I don't really get the whole "feel" thing. I don't doubt that we might perceive differences, but for the life of me I cant figure out what it actually is, and I'm not talking amp in the room versus through monitors.
I think that the importance of feel started to increase once the digital to analog tone delta was reduced to a negligible level. So the olds had to come up with something else to justify their wall of amps.
You can pull some extra sustain and feedback out of a loud amp next to you, but most people who complain about "feel" are using less notes and more hanging space to make up for a lack of interesting ideas that even make a guitar lead necessary in the first place. Play the right notes at the right time with intention and it doesn't matter what it "feels" like. Trying to get through another solo with the same 4-5 licks as the last dozen solos, you might be looking for ANYTHING to keep it interesting.Okay, I have a real opinion kind of...
I don't really get the whole "feel" thing. I don't doubt that we might perceive differences, but for the life of me I cant figure out what it actually is, and I'm not talking amp in the room versus through monitors.
I think that the importance of feel started to increase once the digital to analog tone delta was reduced to a negligible level. So the olds had to come up with something else to justify their wall of amps.
Gotta do the trooch thing and make a foot vibrator so you can still feel the rumbles when using iems.I've always understood "feel" to be the elements of playing that aren't audible to someone after-the-fact or in a recording, but would be apparent to the player in the moment.
Something like latency - once you've recorded it, the listener has no way to know what the roundtrip latency of the recording equipment was, but there's a good chance that this was perceptible to the guitarist as they recorded it. And even then, it's not a change in the content of what you hear, so much as the timing, and it's subtle enough that you don't "hear" it, you "feel" it.
Certain types of compression or gain character might fit into this - where if your gear is naturally compressed, then you might not have to dig in as hard, so once again, while your audience receives the same result, you "feel" different because of the small adjustments you have to make to get the same result.
I'd be willing to put "thump" as a vague term into that bucket, since it's something I don't think translates well to a recording and end up mostly describing the players subjective experience of their own amp, or the characteristics of the playback system.
I mean, I guess it's right in the word: "feel" is the subjective experience of the player. By definition, you can't "prove" it's a thing or not a thing because it's all the things that don't make it to tape. And it's perfectly reasonable that it would matter more to some than to others, given the wide variety in people's playing contexts.
To add to what @TedEH said too.Okay, I have a real opinion kind of...
I don't really get the whole "feel" thing. I don't doubt that we might perceive differences, but for the life of me I cant figure out what it actually is, and I'm not talking amp in the room versus through monitors.
I think that the importance of feel started to increase once the digital to analog tone delta was reduced to a negligible level. So the olds had to come up with something else to justify their wall of amps.
Playing through plugins / computers is pretty much always a much worse experience. At least they are playing though, right?The idea that a lot of guitar-playing kids today have never experienced a real tube amp in a room and are only playing through modelers, plugins, or captures, is perfectly fine to me. Let's democratize tone and gear.
I hate it when a kid who only plays through his computer comes into a Facebook group and some guy would slam him for not having had the pleasure, nay privilege, of playing through "REAL" amps. "What IR? Get a 4x12 and be a real man!"
Gross.
I dont jam with others any more, but I can't imagine being a teenager and not having an amp to take to your friends to jam together.I think it'd be well worth it to anyone who's never been around loud instruments before to get a rehearsal spot for awhile and plan alone and/or jam time for loud and dialing things in etc to get a good overview and experience. Going back to a plugin or modeller after that will give you an idea what you want out of it more. Pros. con's etc. It's hard to lay down a couple grand or whatever but get freinds together and respect each others' time etc and it would be like an investment in everyone's education. It's what's really missing today that people use to be able to get away with more (loud drums/amp etc.). Loud jamming is becoming a lost art in some ways it seems. Alternatively, if you're in a permanant spot and can sound proof it, do that instead. - Back when bands existed, people would sound proof their garage or shed and crank it so they were all more familiar with how things work in 'real life'. No disrespect but loud af in a band is way different than studio anything. It's just not the same skillset, in terms of playing and contorolling dynamics. You need both ideally ,imo. This is an excuse for everyone to buy a reactive load, electric drum set and stick the singer in the closet. Lol.