VHT Pitbull 50CL or 100?

  • Thread starter kazE
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

zimbloth

Nick // Axe Palace
Vendor
Forum MVP
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
17,912
Reaction score
5,186
Location
Boston
I see, fair enough.

How exactly would one amp be more recording friendly than another?

That's a really complicated question and at 4:15am I don't have the energy to answer it right now. There are a million variables in play. However, all I'll say for now is certain amps have a voicing that is more friendly to the typical recording studio environment than others.

The reason 80% of great sounding metal records use a Peavey 5150 isn't because it's that great of an amp, it's just that he way its voiced is extremely flattering through 'industry standard' studio gear/cabinets. Also, its linear midrange characteristic tends to yield good results with quad-tracking heavy guitars. Another amp may kick its ass in real life or in a live band mix, but in the hands of someone like Andy Sneap or Collin Richardson magical things can happen.

That said there are plenty of pros who record with VHTs or other amps and get killer results. Guys like James Murphy come to mind. Just keep in mind the vast majority of studios use (out of necessity) the old standards like Marshall and Mesa cabs loaded with V30s and/or GT75s. Most of them don't have cabs flattering to unique sounding amps like VHTs or Diezels floating around the studio.
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

kazE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2009
Messages
473
Reaction score
33
Location
Upstate NY
Ah makes sense, thanks for the explanation.

You learn something new everyday (or in my case, many things). :hbang:
 

CentaurPorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
249
Location
Fredericton NB
Yes Nick. Please record a clip or 2 so we can put this shit to rest. :)

I would but I have no recording setup atm.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Location
Alaska
Yeah I sent them an email.

I'm curious if anyone here can confirm or debunk this mystery.
The older pittbulls can use either el34 or 6l6 type tubes with the flick of the switch. This was before the UL, and after its conception they dropped that feature from the CLs arsanel.
 

blackrobedone

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
548
Reaction score
37
Location
huntsville, al
For the record, I tried re-amping some studio tracks through my Pittbull through a Mesa cab and it sounded terrible. It was all scratchy highs, upper midrange, and no power. It sounded pretty good from far away, but mic'ed and up close to the speaker it was really bad. We tried a Rivera cab to no avail. We had 4 amps available (JCM 2000, VHT, Mesa Dual Rec, and Soldano) and we went with the Soldano Avenger blended with a little Dual Rec.
 

zimbloth

Nick // Axe Palace
Vendor
Forum MVP
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
17,912
Reaction score
5,186
Location
Boston
For the record, I tried re-amping some studio tracks through my Pittbull through a Mesa cab and it sounded terrible. It was all scratchy highs, upper midrange, and no power.

No shit man. Pittbulls sound weak through V30 cabs. I had a Mesa 4x12 oversized when I first got my UL and it sounded pretty meh. The Pittbull needs good speakers to really do it justice. The Rivera you tried probably had V30s as well, or GT75s. Also mismatches for amps like this.

Scratchy highs, honky upper-mids, loose response, those are characteristics of V30s not the Ultra-Lead dude. The UL is one of the most powerful, thick, tight, harmonically rich, brutal sounding amps on the planet. Period.
 

norrin radcliff

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
287
Reaction score
83
Location
Kansas City, USA
I believe the 100 has a power soak right? You can take it down to 50 watts (I think??).

I played a Pitbull head 4 years ago or something and thought it sounded good. It was the 100, as far as I remember.
 
Top
')