Vik Drama: Round 3

  • Thread starter MikeH
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Promit

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
1,374
Reaction score
158
Location
Baltimore, MD
I admin pages with over 100,000 likes between them outside of work and work in digital marketing full time for a well known electronics company haha.

It's a big dip for a day, but the lifetime of this kinda thing on this internet is measured in hours these days, not weeks, definitely not years.
I wonder if Brendan Eich would agree with you. Sometimes a few days can do a lot of damage.
 

This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

Rook

Electrifying
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
9,055
Reaction score
1,457
Location
London
I wonder if Brendan Eich would agree with you. Sometimes a few days can do a lot of damage.

To continue my previous analogy, that would be the sinking of the titanic.

Very different circumstances, and people still use FireFox.
 

Veldar

Is Post-Thrash?
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
286
Location
Somewhere
I'm sixteen, been to my countrie's LGBT parade and homosexual uncle I the best father figure I've had in my life.

I can't believe that someone would openly say they're homophobic, I'm glad that Vik is getting such a negative response I'll set an example that the metal community has/is changing.
 

Devyn Eclipse Nav

Avid Open C Enthusiast, Aspiring Ghibli Wizard
Joined
Feb 20, 2011
Messages
1,652
Reaction score
153
Location
Chicago, IL
Makes me wonder what he would think of me, someone who at first appears to be a straight, cis, white male, but is ACTUALLY a transgender queer woman.

His head would spin so much we could probably power the server that supports this site off it.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
2,319
Reaction score
86
Location
Wilmington, NC
Well, I'm already growing weary of this whole Vik thing, guys... I mean, at least people continuing to blow it up beyond measure by doing stupid stuff (such as the childish insults and posting the gay pornography everywhere). We all got to take our shots at the guy...but some people just take it too far.

This event has proved two good things to me though:
1.) Vik is a bigger dick than any of us could've imagined.
2.) The metal community banned together for a positive cause, specifically a cause that has been controversial and now has to do with our changing of times. (Refer to my pic below.)

Anyway, I posted a status and figured I'd just screenshot it onto here.
MYPOST_zpsb4821b23.jpg
 

KultureDekay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Location
Gaithersburg, MD
People can come off in many different ways when it comes to disagreeing gay marriage and anything related. Most of the time they quote the bible or whatever (Boring!). But insulting the Cynic dudes and Ola's creation right away? Dayum

btw some assclown told him to take his FB cover off, because according to the clown, Javier Reyes is gay too :ugh:.
 

ElRay

Mostly Harmless
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
4,569
Reaction score
1,798
Location
NoIL
You're still not getting it. People can believe what ever nonsense they want to believe. That doesn't mean that they cannot be corrected when they speak, publish, post, etc. their nonsense. If they don't want their views critiqued, commented on, corrected, etc. then they should keep their ideas to themselves.

Freedom of Speech is NOT freedom from critique, comment or correction.

Vik is free to BELIEVE anything he wants, he just has to deal with the repercussions of begin a bigot. Just as he's free to post his nonsense, people are free to call him out, launch an "internet crusade" and boycott his product.

Threatening violence in not good. So if you're including that in your "internet crusade" label, then I'll agree that that aspect is not acceptable; however, spreading the word that somebody's a bigot and calling for a boycott is totally acceptable.

People earn/deserve respect. Ideas don't. It's not a matter of intelectual superiority to critique, comment or correct ideas released to any public forum.

You hit the nail on the head regarding mythology. There's truly no difference between the stories of Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Norse, Hindu, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Thai, Aboriginal (Americas, African, Indonesian, Australian, etc.), Abrahamic (Babism, Bahá'í Faith, Christianity (all 300+ Sects), Islam (all 50+ Sects), Judaism (all 30+ sects), Rastafarii, Mandaeans, Sabians & Shabakism), Buddhist, Jainist, Hindu, Scientologist, Raelean, e.g. any of the 2700+ omnipotent invisible buddies created by man, mythology, yet somehow the BELIEVERS get special privilege and are free to preach without critique, comment or correction. That is wrong. If BELIEVERS are free to preach their mythology, others are free to point-out where it makes no sense, contradicts reality, is self-conflicting, hypocritical, damaging to society, been used to justify hate, bigotry, discrimination, violence, etc.
 

Edika

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
5,985
Reaction score
3,765
Location
Londonderry, N.Ireland, UK
I agree with Ray.

People get confused and think because they have resolved some controversial issues in their minds, speak to like minded individuals and frequent parts of the internet that are compatible with their ideology, especially people that don't experience discrimination, that these issues have been resolved. A person or group expressing a controversial opinion is considered anachronistic and any reaction by other group or people is thought as an over reaction by the people unaffected by them.

However people that discriminating are usually quite fanatic about it and just won't give up. They feel that they are on a mission. If there is no reaction hen gradually things start seeping in to the subconscious minds of apathetic people. If a group is quite vocal and manipulates circumstances it can not only push for unreasonable changes but even in cases rewrite history in the minds of the majority.

So yes there is mostly freedom of speech in most western countries, but that doesn't mean it is above criticism. This is the way society progresses. People with stupid ideas control the way things works until another more progressive group takes them on and topples them. Unfortunately that leads to the opposite direction sometimes, which should reinforce the belief that civil and human rights are our own creation that change depending on the majority's beliefs.
 

HaloHat

Baritones
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
1,530
Reaction score
220
Location
Seattle WA. & Richfield, UT. & Valencia, Spain
The right to free speech means that you won't go to jail for speaking your mind, however you will still have to face the consequences that follow the things you choose to say.

People seem to forget this a lot.

There are plenty of places in the world today where you will not only go to jail for what you say but where what you say can get you executed. People forget that a lot too.

Internally debating whether or not to post my opinion on the subject in general since this thread has gone way past the VIK issue. Not concerned about consequences, more concerned about the way text in a post can be taken/misunderstood different ways by different people.
 

HaloHat

Baritones
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
1,530
Reaction score
220
Location
Seattle WA. & Richfield, UT. & Valencia, Spain
Jobs was an uncompromising asshole, but last I checked, he never behaved in a discriminatory manner against entire groups of people. Except maybe idiots. He was definitely intolerant of idiots.

I think what the other post was trying to say is the problem was that Jobs was the sole judge and jury as to who is or is not an idiot, to use your example. And to disagree with him was your ticket to a new employment search at the least. You were not going to discuss the issues with him. You are to agree or be gone.
----
edit: up to Dec. 12th 1980.
Ironic that Microsoft/Gates is who kept Apple/Jobs from going out of business.
 

narad

Progressive metal and politics
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
16,784
Reaction score
31,210
Location
Tokyo
I think what the other post was trying to say is the problem was that Jobs was the sole judge and jury as to who is or is not an idiot, to use your example. And to disagree with him was your ticket to a new employment search at the least. You were not going to discuss the issues with him. You are to agree or be gone.

And Jobs was an employer. The flow of currency is opposite. If I get anything out of these types of scenarios it's that people are outright terrible at proposing reasonable analogies!*

*The 'anal' in 'analogies' comes from the Greek, not the Latin. Homophobes fear not!
 
Top
')