wankerness
Well-Known Member
It comes down to the right of an individual to maintain control of his home against false authority. If you look at the end of the thread you'll see the actual law, which is really the only thing that matters. What you have is an appeal to probability fallacy. So it's yeah that seems like it would be right to me. But it doesn't matter what should be right to an individual. It only matters what the law says.
Well, being immune to consequences only applies if you own your house. If you're renting the landlord is perfectly within his rights to kick you out if even something so nebulous as "causing trouble" is in the lease agreement anywhere. But yeah, the cops can't do anything if you can prove it was under X decibels and you don't piss them off when they come over so they nail you on some other charge