WaffleTheEpic
Banned
To be fair, any US based company shipping you a guitar would probably have a no-return policy, seeing as shipping to anywhere outside the US is expensive as hell.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
... there is no way I'm spending that kind of coin only to find that the extra half inch isn't enough.
28.625" scale FTW!
I use a Circle K .094 (Guitar string NOT a bass string) for my low E for my 27 scale... but thats just cause I like big strings lol. A .074 was way too loose when I tried that. I felt an .080 was perfect for low E.
I actually bought the .094 as a joke/experiment because Circle K was having a ridiculous sale but ended up just falling in love with it. People always say that larger strings are too bassy but I think with my setup it sounds super clear and full.
I'm not really bothered by the inlay on the Schecter and if the build quality is as Mo good as my Hellraiser it should be a great guitar.
9-82 balanced set from Circle K is perfect for 26.5".....I like 'em cause if you WANT it, you can get that "picked slightly sharp" sound, but under normal playing its not noticeable. Somehow with my Circle K strings I'm able to have a stupid low action at 26.5" and Drop E...didn't measure it exact but its less than 2.5mm on the bass side and well under 1mm on treble side....slick!
Question, I'm looking at a 27" scale Agile 8 string right now and was wondering what would be a good gauge F string for tuning the whole thing down one whole step.
Thanks.
sorry for being picky, but moving from F to F# is actually a half step... now to answer the question:
A .074 daddario string tuned to F1 on the 27" scale will have almost exactly the same tension as a .042 tuned to E2 (standard) on the 25.5" scale, or a set of .009s tuned to standard on an ibanez, fender, etc. I recommend starting with a .074 and only going up if you really need more tension, because the tone becomes more basslike with thicker strings.
Thanks, but how is a string either sharp or flat in and of itself?