Do you find both balances well? A2 in particular?I don't think I can answer this is a helpful way, other their on-paper differences, due to the differences between my two specific examples.
The Aries is swamp ash and somewhere just over 6 1/2 lbs, but the A2 is black limba, and over 8lbs. My brain has a bit of a hard time "equalizing" other aspects since that weight makes them feel very very different.
In addition, my A2 has a trem, and it's my first trem-equipped guitar in years after swearing them off completely.
In the most basic terms, my belly/moobs prefer the deeper "belly cut" on the A2. I think with a top or burst finish, the A2 looks so much better because it's a bit more symmetrical. If you like rear jacks, the A2 has one.
The Aries's forearm contour is more comfortable. The bolt-on Aries is available in a 22-fret version and a bevel-delete version while the A2 isn't. The Aries also has a metal jack plate which is easier to service than the A2's body edge barrel-style, and the Aries's plate is more durable to blind poking with a pointy cable plug so I'd expect fewer scratches in the finish around the jack of the Aries compared to the A2.
Now that the neck heels and pockets are equalized, my overall preference (I think) for the A2 is narrowed, even though I end up playing my Aries more because it's lighter and has the fixed bridge, so the Aries just gets more play time when there're spontaneous tuning changes on my mind.
I'm always a fan of how offsets look but I often struggle to balance them(Jazzmasters).