Elon Musk is on a roll

[wheresthefbomb]

"represents the antifa branch of boston"

this right out the gate tells you this person is a clown. decentralized movements don't have "representatives," and anyone claiming to be such is either a cop or a dork in clown makeup.

 

[CanserDYI]

It was a parody based on your stereotypes but I guess that went over your head. We vote red because the blue schmucks want to dismantle the 2nd Amendment, they falsely pretend that it's all about duck hunting and skeet shooting. But I do have fun at the range. I'm a non Republican conservative and I've never known a white supremacist so you'd have to ask someone else. There's 100 million gun owners in this country, of which a small percentage are rednecks, then there's the underage Antifa xbox warriors that have guns stashed that they bought illegally from the street corner, which is the same place street gang thugs bought theirs. So after they theoretically disarm the lawful 100 million (LOL) all that'll be left are illegal gun owners which gun control laws won't affect. There, now you can consider yourself educated on the subject. Aren't I a nice guy?

LMAO dude you said WE, you just called yourself a white supremacist redneck type. Holy shit, this is so funny.

 

[Hollowway]

I think AMOS is a bot, lol. If I were to design a bot that would automatically parrot right wing talking points, lies, and propaganda, I would make it exactly this way. Opening up a browser or reading a book would disprove so much of what he's saying, that it's hard to believe it's an actual person.

So, I'm going to ignore all of the AMOSbot posts and get this thread back on track, which is talking about Musk and Twitter.:

Do you guys think he's thought through the whole "free speech" thing, and what it would really entail, or do you think he even cares? If I were in his shoes I'd steer well clear of Twitter. In my mind, he thinks of himself as Tony Stark, and he's honestly the closest thing we've got. I can see him buying a lot of companies, and doing some potentially really cool things. But I just don't get why he wants Twitter. For instance, he's going to have to come up with a policy on where to draw the line with respect to what is allowed to be said. Because he can't literally allow anything to be said on there, or it will turn into 4chan. For instance, I'm guessing that some stuff will be completely off limits. Like he won't show videos of murder or pornography, or anything like that. But will he permit a description of what sort of thing? How graphic of a description does there have to be before he censors it? It's easy to say you're in favor of free speech, but it's MUCH harder to actually do it, because there's no way a company can literally allow its users to post whatever they want. So it's clear he means that there are certain decisions he doesn't agree with, but I worry he's going to get mired in this, and stuck.

Or, is he buying it because he has plans with what he can do with all of the user data? A single person with that amount of unchecked access could do a huge amount of advertising, or even combining businesses. Maybe all twitter users who use Starlink get it for free, everyone else sees a bunch of ads, or has to pay a membership?

 

[ScottThunes1960]

Fringe extremist holds extremist views? *gasp* and the media picked a joke of a representative for "the other side"? *double gasp*

It’s a comedian doing a bit. It just seemed appropriate to post for the sake of those who would rather react than think.

 

[BlackMastodon]

I love that this thread is in the Movies and TV Shows subforum.

Also, I didn't watch the video, but it's sad that the line is so blurred between parody and what wouldn't actually be seen on the news that we can't tell. Like AMOS' first post, I legitimately read that in a sarcastic voice because it ticked every box for stereotypical conservative who's mad at "the liberals." But alas, here we are.

Also I'm Canadian and could give a shit about Burnie. His ideals are so hilariously centre-left to the rest of the world that it's insane watching the 2 fringes in the US eat each other over basic human rights.

(also don't tell AMOS that I'm stealing hard working American jobs)

 

[wheresthefbomb]

Do you guys think he's thought through the whole "free speech" thing, and what it would really entail, or do you think he even cares? If I were in his shoes I'd steer well clear of Twitter. In my mind, he thinks of himself as Tony Stark, and he's honestly the closest thing we've got. I can see him buying a lot of companies, and doing some potentially really cool things. But I just don't get why he wants Twitter. For instance, he's going to have to come up with a policy on where to draw the line with respect to what is allowed to be said. Because he can't literally allow anything to be said on there, or it will turn into 4chan. For instance, I'm guessing that some stuff will be completely off limits. Like he won't show videos of murder or pornography, or anything like that. But will he permit a description of what sort of thing? How graphic of a description does there have to be before he censors it? It's easy to say you're in favor of free speech, but it's MUCH harder to actually do it, because there's no way a company can literally allow its users to post whatever they want. So it's clear he means that there are certain decisions he doesn't agree with, but I worry he's going to get mired in this, and stuck.

Or, is he buying it because he has plans with what he can do with all of the user data? A single person with that amount of unchecked access could do a huge amount of advertising, or even combining businesses. Maybe all twitter users who use Starlink get it for free, everyone else sees a bunch of ads, or has to pay a membership?

This is how I imagine most of his decision making takes place. I mean we're talking about a dude who shoots dicks into space with cars on them just because he can. I legitimately don't think he thought about it that hard, it just seemed like an edgy "Musky" maneuver so he did it. It doesn't have to be a good idea, it just has to be "rAdiCaL"

I remember when he did that car stunt one of my coworkers in an upscale kitchen thought it was so cool and I was just like "cool yeah none of us can afford health insurance but elon musk shot a fucking car into space." You can't force people to love themselves.

I love that this thread is in the Movies and TV Shows subforum.

I keep doing a double-take every time it's not in P&CE, I thought it had gotten deleted yesterday cause I couldn't find it there hahaha

 

[AMOS]

LMAO dude you said WE, you just called yourself a white supremacist redneck type. Holy shit, this is so funny.

Can you ever read between the lines? We as in Conservatives, You must be like 16 or something. Or maybe you smoke too much Indica

 

[AMOS]

I think AMOS is a bot, lol. If I were to design a bot that would automatically parrot right wing talking points, lies, and propaganda, I would make it exactly this way. Opening up a browser or reading a book would disprove so much of what he's saying, that it's hard to believe it's an actual person.

So, I'm going to ignore all of the AMOSbot posts and get this thread back on track, which is talking about Musk and Twitter.:

Do you guys think he's thought through the whole "free speech" thing, and what it would really entail, or do you think he even cares? If I were in his shoes I'd steer well clear of Twitter. In my mind, he thinks of himself as Tony Stark, and he's honestly the closest thing we've got. I can see him buying a lot of companies, and doing some potentially really cool things. But I just don't get why he wants Twitter. For instance, he's going to have to come up with a policy on where to draw the line with respect to what is allowed to be said. Because he can't literally allow anything to be said on there, or it will turn into 4chan. For instance, I'm guessing that some stuff will be completely off limits. Like he won't show videos of murder or pornography, or anything like that. But will he permit a description of what sort of thing? How graphic of a description does there have to be before he censors it? It's easy to say you're in favor of free speech, but it's MUCH harder to actually do it, because there's no way a company can literally allow its users to post whatever they want. So it's clear he means that there are certain decisions he doesn't agree with, but I worry he's going to get mired in this, and stuck.

Or, is he buying it because he has plans with what he can do with all of the user data? A single person with that amount of unchecked access could do a huge amount of advertising, or even combining businesses. Maybe all twitter users who use Starlink get it for free, everyone else sees a bunch of ads, or has to pay a membership?

Hey dick smoker, things were on track, I made a simple statement about Musk and of course you and the rest of the libtards couldn't respect the fact that I'm entitled to my opinion.

 

[CanserDYI]

Can you ever read between the lines? We as in Conservatives, You must be like 16 or something. Or maybe you smoke too much Indica

I said "why is it that most white supremacist, redneck type people vote red?" in which you reply "we vote red because..." thought you were outta here?

EDIT: Lmao libtards.

 

[AMOS]

This is precisely what's been going on on Twitter, and what Musk wanted to change. But you're too fucking stupid to see that.

 

[profwoot]

This is precisely what's been going on on Twitter, and what Musk wanted to change. But you're too fucking stupid to see that.

To what does "this" refer? You keep getting pwned on the internet and daddy musk is going to somehow save you from that?

Your new avatar is quite demonstrative of your ilk. Your arguments aren't supposed to make sense; you get your dopamine fix just from wasting the time of good people.

 

[CanserDYI]

@Randy @MaxOfMetal as much as I like poking conservatives and seeing their reaction, we should close this thread if you can, its a fuckin dumpster fire.

 

[jaxadam]

SSO is on a roll