KJGaruda
Likes a good riff
It looks so stubby...
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Yeah, not feeling this thing at all. They should do a 7-string Cadillac if anything. This thing has already been done by ESP and Epiphone. And probably better at that.
Epi Heafy 7 = Ltd ec407 = this.
Do we really need the same shit over and over?
Epi Heafy 7 = Ltd ec407 = this.
Do we really need the same shit over and over?
The problem with actives in high end guitars is just the fact that they're EQed and compressed, which kind of sterilizes the tone of the guitar itself and gives it a very consistent sound. This is both good and bad, good because you can make guitars literally made out of laminate sound identical to a typical ~500 dollar guitar, but it's bad because a very small amount of the actual guitar quality will shine through (basically sustain and only some of the guitar's tonal quality itself as the tone is precolored by the active circuit's EQ and compression..) meaning with things built to rely on the build quality and it's materials simply won't shine through. With passives, while the priority in terms of tone still go player->amp->pickup->guitar tonewoods, it still will make enough of a difference to sound different in other guitars and give them unique characteristics, unlike EMGs which are designed to always sound the same regardless of the situation (the positive point of them, especially if you love that sound)Either wood matters in the sound of the guitar or it doesn't. It *might* matter less with actives - I really don't have the experience to say for sure - but I fail to see how wood could matter with a passive pickup but not with an active. And based on how big a deal players around here make about body wood even when active pickups are involved, I'm going to guess that I'm not the only one who thinks that.
Its a satin black lespaul with emgs. Its a metal guitar. That genre where lead players go widdley widdley on the highest frets
24,75" scale. Cue the whiners.
^I just dont like less than 24 cuz ive run into things i couldnt play before when all i had was 22.
Yeah, down tuning on 24.75 would sound mellow and stiff probably. ive never owned a les paul to try it.
I like 25.5 best, but i wish one of these 'metal guitar' companies would make a 25.125" -right in between a les paul and a strat.
Sliding on small gauges for the high string cuts my callouses sometimes, and some big chords are already painful on 25.5, so im sure there's a market for something like that.
WARNING: rant ahead. Duck and cover.
I have no sympathy whatsoever for those of you complaining about the scale length and number of frets on this model. Assuming that you would play a non-superstrat to begin with*, you've had the model you want for years: the ESP/LTD EC and the Ibanez ARZ both have 25"+ scale lengths and 24 frets, and there are new models of both coming this year with those specs. Until the Epiphone MKH signature, there hadn't been a "traditional spec" Les Paul 7 (24.75" scale with 22 frets) available in new production since Epiphone discontinued the Les Paul 7 in the early 2000s. There are now two options for that niche, the Epiphone and the Dean, which means that *maybe* we'll still have one available in two years. So don't whine to me that this *one* model doesn't happen to cater to your specs, which are easily found in virtually every other production seven-string, when it's practically the only option for my preferred spec in an off-the-shelf guitar. You don't like it? Fine. Don't play it.
/rant
*Show of hands: how many of you actually own a non-superstrat 7-string? And how many of those are "traditional" LP or Tele types as opposed to pointy metal guitars like the Iceman 7? I have four: 1 Tele-style, 1 LP, and two in the thinline hollow/semi-hollow mode. There's not a double-cutaway to be found in my collection, in any string configuration. This isn't a fashion statement for me; these are the guitars I can comfortably play.