Crash Dandicoot
» B E H O L D
That's a nice pic of my RG you've got there![]()
If you ever wanna sell it I know a poor soul who pines over it...
That's a nice pic of my RG you've got there![]()
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Related but I really want a fender shortscale but nothing about them are really conducive to the styles of music I like or want to play
The Parker is definitely not the most versatile high-end 7. One of the least versatile guitars IMO.
2nd that. The super versatile pickup options and a floating trem with tension adjustment which you can limit or block completely with a built in mechanism sound pretty versatile..Why do you say that? I have one and the tonal options are great for me.
2nd that. The super versatile pickup options and a floating trem with tension adjustment which you can limit or block completely with a built in mechanism sound pretty versatile..
Why do you say that? I have one and the tonal options are great for me.
Why do you say that? I have one and the tonal options are great for me.
Tonally they're a bit thin-sounding, and pickup options are a pain. I mean, what's a less versatile guitar that still has 2 pickups? If I had an LP or something I could always swap in some HB-sized P-90s. If I had a strat I could put an HB in the bridge or stacked HBs in the other positions, and I have a pickguard so swapping through all those configurations is a super simple install.
Tonally they're a bit thin-sounding, and pickup options are a pain. I mean, what's a less versatile guitar that still has 2 pickups?
I'm not sure if I agree with thin-sounding...as far as tonal options..one of my parkers is this:
![]()
It has pizeo, two single coils (a lipstick for cryin' out loud), every possible switching combo, and I sometimes put a hot rails in the bridge. This guitar has seen country, metal, rock, and a symphony-rock gig.
like the vast majority of the market is 2 humbucker guitars. Or are you counting "versatile" to the ability to sound like a strat?
with 2 humbcuker, split coil, and piezzo, the only thing the guitar is missing is a middle coil for the in-between positions of a Strat. If you realy want that sound, then get a start for that recording then
are the humbuckers smaller on the Parkers? in order to not be able to re-place them for something more versatile?
speaking off, are the pickups rear mounted? or jsut dont have any ears?. If its so, then yeah having the "wrong" set of pickups and the lack of a chance for you to upgrade them would not make it versatile liek you say
yeah problem seems to be the pickups then, and with the lack of an option to change them you are kinda stuck with it.
what a weird design choice really. But again these are the same guys who decided to eliminate fret tangs and just glue them in into a plain fretboard, making the job of a tech much more fun
And the same people who also paint over the sides of the nut so you can't change it without causing some sort of finish damage.
But honestly, even apart from that it's just not a versatile guitar. In some hypothetical gig night where you play songs from 50s-2017, a good PRS will get you doing a very respectable take on a lot of those tones. The Fly would probably do passable 70s/80s tones, but I feel probably not as good as a charvel / general superstrat with a hot PAF bridge. If it were just the fact that it has piezo, a JP7 would still do better metal tones, and just sounds a bit more like a typical strat/LP type of thing.
I'll put it this way. Out of the like 18 guitars I own, my Parker Fly (and every Parker I've ever played -- which aren't any of the weird tele sort of things but all H/H fly/maxxfly) is the least versatile sounding guitar I own, with the exception of a couple things with just crazy hot pickups in there. I really need to be in "that mood" to grab the fly.