angus
Well-Known Member
Yup, which is why if you know you want to do a PhD, you start doing research as early as possible (often with a couple different labs over the course of the 4 years, unless you stumble upon a great group doing research in field that interests you). The most ideal thing would be if you could find research group that interests you early and stick with it; the longer you spend in one group, the more valuable work you'll actually get done, more likely to contribute to publications and the more responsibility you'll be given.
At a lot of top universities, terminal master's programs will not give you any more time to pursue research, and most who it do it are not there long enough to accomplish much of anything (certainly not more than you could in undergrad, particularly if you stay with one lab for a while). You certainly won't be doing PhD quality work anyway. You will definitely more know by virtue of having gone through the gamut of undergrad classes, but you effectively are doing the first two years of a PhD except that you don't stay when you are done (usually). Then you'll just repeat those same two years when you start your PhD.
A masters program is great if you didn't do research in undergrad, are changing fields, or had some time off. If you are coming out of undergrad with research in the field of the PhD you are applying to, that is ideal. A master's in the same field will not make you substantially more competitive unless you are trying to fix a problem in your background (bad grades, etc).
In his case, I would not recommend it, because the plan is in place from the beginning, so he can approach undergrad with the intention of doing a PhD and start working with a lab from the beginning.
At a lot of top universities, terminal master's programs will not give you any more time to pursue research, and most who it do it are not there long enough to accomplish much of anything (certainly not more than you could in undergrad, particularly if you stay with one lab for a while). You certainly won't be doing PhD quality work anyway. You will definitely more know by virtue of having gone through the gamut of undergrad classes, but you effectively are doing the first two years of a PhD except that you don't stay when you are done (usually). Then you'll just repeat those same two years when you start your PhD.
A masters program is great if you didn't do research in undergrad, are changing fields, or had some time off. If you are coming out of undergrad with research in the field of the PhD you are applying to, that is ideal. A master's in the same field will not make you substantially more competitive unless you are trying to fix a problem in your background (bad grades, etc).
In his case, I would not recommend it, because the plan is in place from the beginning, so he can approach undergrad with the intention of doing a PhD and start working with a lab from the beginning.