Deadnightshade
U gonna eat that?
I got some days ago an eleven rack. I might keep the desktop HD as a backup unit, but I don't see myself turning it on soon.
Pod HD pros:
-Good price (for the desktop and HD500 mostly).
-Amp and cab DEPs are great for fine-tuning your midrange, perhaps achieving even more realistic mids up to the "hot djent" area. After that, chaos.
-Fancier effects for dreamy patches. Their quality might not be top of the line compared to fx-dedicated units or Axe-fx etc, but they are extremely good.
-Ability to deal a parallel clean/distorted bass patch.
Pod HD cons:
-You look at it and it digitally clips. Before you plug it to the outlet.
-Stupid lack of a DI/reamping solution on most hardware models, percentages instead of Hz, etc you know the stuff.
-Incosistent low frequency response.
-Bad digital upper-end harshness that's hard to get rid of without killing the good high end. Most of the times you just get used to it.
-Cabs ranging from okaish to bad. Even when you pick the cab that responds closer to the way you like or has an exceptional frequency response in a specific area, you end up spending more DSP eq'ing or working around its weak or bad spots, instead of EQing the whole patch, if that makes any sense.
-Dual amp configurations are often needed to cover the aforementioned weak spots for heavy rhythm stuff, but still compromises have to be made in terms of DSP and EQing.
That's it from the top of my head from my short experience with the eleven rack and my longer (and generally unsuccesful) with the HD desktop.
To clarify, the HD is a king in its price range in terms of versatility, but an eleven rack is a more user-friendly solution for just a little more dough if you find it used. Personally I got mine used for 400 euros, and though it's steep compared to what it runs for now in the US used market, I still believe I got a bang for my buck.
Pod HD pros:
-Good price (for the desktop and HD500 mostly).
-Amp and cab DEPs are great for fine-tuning your midrange, perhaps achieving even more realistic mids up to the "hot djent" area. After that, chaos.
-Fancier effects for dreamy patches. Their quality might not be top of the line compared to fx-dedicated units or Axe-fx etc, but they are extremely good.
-Ability to deal a parallel clean/distorted bass patch.
Pod HD cons:
-You look at it and it digitally clips. Before you plug it to the outlet.
-Stupid lack of a DI/reamping solution on most hardware models, percentages instead of Hz, etc you know the stuff.
-Incosistent low frequency response.
-Bad digital upper-end harshness that's hard to get rid of without killing the good high end. Most of the times you just get used to it.
-Cabs ranging from okaish to bad. Even when you pick the cab that responds closer to the way you like or has an exceptional frequency response in a specific area, you end up spending more DSP eq'ing or working around its weak or bad spots, instead of EQing the whole patch, if that makes any sense.
-Dual amp configurations are often needed to cover the aforementioned weak spots for heavy rhythm stuff, but still compromises have to be made in terms of DSP and EQing.
That's it from the top of my head from my short experience with the eleven rack and my longer (and generally unsuccesful) with the HD desktop.
To clarify, the HD is a king in its price range in terms of versatility, but an eleven rack is a more user-friendly solution for just a little more dough if you find it used. Personally I got mine used for 400 euros, and though it's steep compared to what it runs for now in the US used market, I still believe I got a bang for my buck.