This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Being young doesn't really have anything to do with it. I wasn't even born before Jimi Hendrix died and I fully appreciate and love his work. The same goes for many bands that hit the height of their popularity before I was born, I love a lot of music from before my time. Pantera just doesn't do anything for me. There were a lot of other bands playing heavy music in the 90s. Slayer was a pretty badass band that released some heavy material in the 90s also.
I bought it too.I may think Alexi's playing is less than innovative lately, but I still just got the Halo of Blood disc. It's really good, but not like their older stuff.
I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt with not putting things in proper perspective. There were a lot of other bands playing heavy music in the 90s, but very few shared in the popularity that Pantera basked in, which was the whole point: Pantera enjoyed the height of their success during a time when heavy music wasn't "in", and Dimebag was the one driving those riffs. Belittling Dimebag and his accomplishments with pigeonholing the very people giving him those accolades as "meathead metalheads" is absurd, and your whole timeline was wrong on top of it.
It's funny that you mention Slayer making heavy music in the 90s, because toward the end of that decade, they completely changed their style on Diabolus in Musica, which was trying to do less of the thrash stuff and more of the heavy metal that grooved, which was what Pantera was doing.
How was my timeline wrong? I'm not belittling Dimebag in the least, I'm not saying he's a bad player/writer/musician at all. He wrote some cool riffs and solos, but he is overrated IMO. This thread is about opinions. Music in general is all about your opinion of what you like and what you don't, I'm not saying definitively that Dimebag didn't have any hand in popularizing heavy metal, I'm saying he wasn't solely responsible for it and it kinda seems like you're implying that he was. While Pantera was still a glam metal band Slayer released Reign In Blood and South of Heaven, two albums which sound much heavier to me than Pantera's Power Metal which was released the same year as South of Heaven and two years after Reign In Blood. I listened to Cowboys From Hell and Seasons In The Abyss alternating track for track and Slayer just sounded more interesting to me. CFH wasn't bad in any sense of the word, just not my thing. It's just my opinion, no need to get all bent out of shape over it.
Your timeline is wrong because you said the last time Pantera played together was 2003, when that was when they broke up, and not their last actual show. And saying the main reason he gets so much recognition is because he died young absolutely belittles him, as well as calling people who do give him recognition "meathead metalheads." Those are your words.
It's fine to have an opinion, but you're basing it off of something that isn't true. Dimebag was insanely popular in the 90s. He was right up there with Kirk Hammett in guitar polls, and on the cover of way too many guitar magazines to count. That's why I figured you were young, because if you were conscious of what was going on during that decade, you definitely wouldn't write something like "he's gets so much recognition because he died young."
And we are arguing two different things. I'm not arguing over which is heavier between Pantera and Slayer, or what albums. I'm arguing that Pantera was pushing the boundaries in heavy music at a time when it wasn't even popular to play metal. That's a pretty incredible accomplishment.
And I'm not bent out of shape. In fact, I love heavy metal and the history behind it and the bands that create the music. I can talk about this all day, so don't take it as an attack on you, or your opinion. I don't expect you to gush over Dimebag or Pantera, and you can think he is overrated, which I won't argue. I will, however, argue that his death doesn't really play a part in the recognition he does get, and what they did in the 90s was an incredible accomplishment.
Hugs.
I once picked up a guitar magazine that had the guy from muse on the cover hailing him as the new Hendrix, so I'll have to throw him in the mix too.
I didn't say that 2003 was the last time they played, I said that's when they broke up.
Also Pantera broke up in 2003, Damageplan was formed in 2004 and Dimebag was killed in 2004, definitely not 3 years after they stopped playing.
I'm not so much arguing Slayer is heavier as I am arguing that Slayer was doing more to push boundaries earlier than Pantera was imo.
I bought it too.
Technical wise, it's not as good as the old albums, but the mood and theme is there again.
We have a thread btw http://www.sevenstring.org/forum/general-music-discussion/212613-children-bodom-megathread-25.html
How this thread did not turn into a flame war is beyond me.
You guys are awesome.
Chuck from Death, people claim both of them as legends but iv never heard anything from either of them that wowed me![]()
who do you think is getting way more attention than they deserve? For me, it would definitely be Alexi Laiho. He is not a bad guitarist at all, but he is not tops. He has the big name endorsement, signature model, magazine covers, large tours, etc. But he doesn nothing that blows me away. Again, he is a really good guitarist, but not as good as his status would indicate.
those sloppy drunks from dragonforce
not trying to start a shitstorm; but at the risk of getting neg-repped to the depths of hell, i'd have to say Dimebag.
Chris Broderick. His stuff with 'Deth are just bleh...
Misha Mansoor.
Vai. I can respect his technical prowess and chops, but I personally have never heard anything from him that I can personally connect with as a piece, song, or otherwise. He may as well be a super-fast, well-programmed synth to me - well organised, extensively proficient, but just lacking in anything I can find truly worthy of the levels of praise he receives.
I am trying very hard to not get to butthurt but really? come on.
The dude founded 2 genres of metal. He was a serious musical genius and what I consider to be a real ground breaker. Just listen to The Sound of Perseverance, then listen to any death/prog/melodic death metal past the year 2000. His influence is EVERYWHERE. For that reason I really don't think he can be over rated. I suppose anyone can make 2 subgenresbut how many people can say they invented something as big as Death metal and progressive death metal? Not many.
Vai is an acquired taste that takes years to develop. I heard of vai when I was in grade 8 in high school, couldn't stand his music and never touched it until I overheard real illusions. Two songs really stood out - building the church and K'm pee du wee. After that I actually took up guitar lessons to be able to play with that kind of control.
Even after years of listening to vai - I don't dig all his music. Some songs stand out more than others depending on the style you lean towards. What he does do well is variety of different styles and no two songs sound alike. Each song has a story and over the most basic riffs he can make it soar.
Check out the following videos to gain an appreciation - not many guitarists can pull of that level of feel behind their notes.