diagrammatiks
Well-Known Member
How do the moderns compare to the Tosin set?
kinda terribly.
The moderns are a bit heavier. but the Tosin has them beat on versatility and split coil tones.
How do the moderns compare to the Tosin set?
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
kinda terribly.
The moderns are a bit heavier. but the Tosin has them beat on versatility and split coil tones.
Which of the Fluences available in 7-string are the least compressed? Unfortunately, the descriptions are "imprecise".
- A lot of the descriptions of the Moderns say they're "less compressed" than EMGs. That still implies they're compressed
- The Merrow's are supposed to be very passive-like and are supposed to have "up-front dynamics", but I've seen reviews that say they're compressed and don't have the dynamics you'd expect
- Classics don't have any info other than V1 on the neck has "the dynamics and output level you want."
- V2 on the Tosin's are described as having "Passive pickup perfection", but I've seen reviews that say they're too compressed, which I would expect, if they're intended to have a mode optimized for tapping.
- I haven't been able to find anything regarding dynamics/compressiveness of the Javier Reyes set.
Thanks. Tone-wise I know which ones I like, but online demos are not going to be able to show compression/lack-of-dynamics, unless the demo makes a point of playing softly and loudly w/o additional compression in the signal chain.Listen to many online demos of each and go with what sounds better to you. The classics should be less compressed (I think?) than all the others. In the end go by what you like, not what someone else thinks...
Look up a guy on YouTube named Gerry Trevino. He has a couple of demos of the Classics vs other pickups and he includes DI files to download. They are the 6 string OG versions with no voice 3, but they’re some of the better DIs I’ve found. They are what turned me on to the Classics and made me track some down to try. They’re my favorite Fluences still and supposedly, the 7 and 8 string Open Cores sound just like them. I recently tried out 7 string Merrows as those are adjacent supposedly to Classics and was underwhelmed. That said, I have my suspicions that the pickups in the guitar I played may have had some type of issue.
The classics, keith merrow, and javier reyes sets would be the least compressed of the fishman stuff that I've heard.Which of the Fluences available in 7-string are the least compressed? Unfortunately, the descriptions are "imprecise".
- A lot of the descriptions of the Moderns say they're "less compressed" than EMGs. That still implies they're compressed
- The Merrow's are supposed to be very passive-like and are supposed to have "up-front dynamics", but I've seen reviews that say they're compressed and don't have the dynamics you'd expect
- Classics don't have any info other than V1 on the neck has "the dynamics and output level you want."
- V2 on the Tosin's are described as having "Passive pickup perfection", but I've seen reviews that say they're too compressed, which I would expect, if they're intended to have a mode optimized for tapping.
- I haven't been able to find anything regarding dynamics/compressiveness of the Javier Reyes set.
Which of the Fluences available in 7-string are the least compressed? Unfortunately, the descriptions are "imprecise".
- A lot of the descriptions of the Moderns say they're "less compressed" than EMGs. That still implies they're compressed
- The Merrow's are supposed to be very passive-like and are supposed to have "up-front dynamics", but I've seen reviews that say they're compressed and don't have the dynamics you'd expect
- Classics don't have any info other than V1 on the neck has "the dynamics and output level you want."
- V2 on the Tosin's are described as having "Passive pickup perfection", but I've seen reviews that say they're too compressed, which I would expect, if they're intended to have a mode optimized for tapping.
- I haven't been able to find anything regarding dynamics/compressiveness of the Javier Reyes set.
100% agreed. For 7 string stuff from EMG I personally find the Super 77-7 set to sound amazing.I don't know how they managed to get EMG 707s to sound so much like trash but wow those things are ASS. 81s are damn good and hold their weight but these 707s suck donkey balls. Fizzy, scooped, kinda boomy, very little clarity especially on a low A. Very compressed and they have a kind of twang on the top end that sounds so scratchy I can't take it and you can't dial it out easily. The fact that they're lower output than my X2N in my bird and still aren't as tight, clear, or dynamic is just a shame.
ew
100% agreed. For 7 string stuff from EMG I personally find the Super 77-7 set to sound amazing.
I agree I wish they had a coil split as well. But for a nice simple humbucker set emg's retroactives are the best thing they have going IMO.lol I didn't realize this was the wrong thread, I thought this was the emg thread whoooops
I'm not gonna swap pickups since I'm not keeping it long but I really wanna try the retro actives, if they would split I would've tried a pair but sadly they do not
I don't know how they managed to get EMG 707s to sound so much like trash but wow those things are ASS. 81s are damn good and hold their weight but these 707s suck donkey balls. Fizzy, scooped, kinda boomy, very little clarity especially on a low A. Very compressed and they have a kind of twang on the top end that sounds so scratchy I can't take it and you can't dial it out easily. The fact that they're lower output than my X2N in my bird and still aren't as tight, clear, or dynamic is just a shame.
ew
Which of the Fluences available in 7-string are the least compressed? Unfortunately, the descriptions are "imprecise".
- A lot of the descriptions of the Moderns say they're "less compressed" than EMGs. That still implies they're compressed
- The Merrow's are supposed to be very passive-like and are supposed to have "up-front dynamics", but I've seen reviews that say they're compressed and don't have the dynamics you'd expect
- Classics don't have any info other than V1 on the neck has "the dynamics and output level you want."
- V2 on the Tosin's are described as having "Passive pickup perfection", but I've seen reviews that say they're too compressed, which I would expect, if they're intended to have a mode optimized for tapping.
- I haven't been able to find anything regarding dynamics/compressiveness of the Javier Reyes set.
... moderns which are definitely the best sounding active I've heard, but super compressed. I recently got the Javier Reyes set installed and while It's definitely better, I still find myself hearing too much compression.
Thanks guys! That's what I was afraid of. My assumption is that the Abasi's are just as compressed, if not more, because they're supposed to be great for tapping.I have the Kieth Merrow set that came in my KM7 mkiii. They aren’t dynamic at all. It feels like no matter how I play, where I palm mute, and how hard I pick, they always sound the same...
Thanks guys! That's what I was afraid of. My assumption is that the Abasi's are just as compressed, if not more, because they're supposed to be great for tapping.
Anybody got a set of Classics they can test? Can you play very quiet, increase volume to that "edge of break-up" point and then play harder to push it over the edge? Without messing with the volume control, of course.
The classics, keith merrow, and javier reyes sets would be the least compressed of the fishman stuff that I've heard.
Not sure how well known this is, but the KM set has a Classic neck. Only the bridge is different.
In my experience the neck pickup felt and sounded just like the KM bridge but with less treble. It didn’t have that “tubular” wide open sound that my other passive necks have. I know people like them, but this is just my 2 cents as someone who plays passives and wanted to try actives. Good luck on your search!
You sure something's not wrong with your 707's? I love my 707's. I just lower them really low and they balance out well. Maybe they don't agree your gear or guitar or something.I don't know how they managed to get EMG 707s to sound so much like trash but wow those things are ASS. 81s are damn good and hold their weight but these 707s suck donkey balls. Fizzy, scooped, kinda boomy, very little clarity especially on a low A. Very compressed and they have a kind of twang on the top end that sounds so scratchy I can't take it and you can't dial it out easily. The fact that they're lower output than my X2N in my bird and still aren't as tight, clear, or dynamic is just a shame.
ew