RickyCigs
Banned
Highlight your amp model on your unit, click on the move button them press right. It will open up the second path.
Line 6 POD HD Thread
- Thread starter Variant
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 500x cock wobbler cockstand compatibility cradling feces frfr guitar hd pro hd300 hd500 hd500 jsx kb100 hd500x info issues jbl line line 6 line sicks line6 line6 pod hd pro metal 7string metal amp head noise noise problem peavey 6505 pod pod hd pod hd bean pod hd desktop pod hd pro pod hd500 poo nozzle poweramp powered problem sc-607b speaker trouble windows 10
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Highlight your amp model on your unit, click on the move button them press right. It will open up the second path.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
friez256
Member
Used an HD500 on this with my band. Day In Day Out - NEW SONG TEASER (EP 2013) - YouTube
Santuzzo
Well-Known Member
I know this is probably old news for most of you, but I have just recently discovered the possibility to record a DI signal simultaneously along with my patch-signal using a dual tone patch on my HD 500.
Tried it for the first time today and it works like a charm!
I had already been considering getting an HD pro for its dry-out but now that I can basically do the same on my HD500 I am a happy camper.
Only with dual amp patches this will not work, of course, but most of my patches are non-dual amp patches!
Tried it for the first time today and it works like a charm!
I had already been considering getting an HD pro for its dry-out but now that I can basically do the same on my HD500 I am a happy camper.
Only with dual amp patches this will not work, of course, but most of my patches are non-dual amp patches!
sevenstringj
Banned
Are you saying it's possible to have a direct out with the built-in cab sim and an amp out without the cab sim at the same time? And how do you say that you use a dual tone patch for this and then say it doesn't work for dual amp patches???
Santuzzo
Well-Known Member
Are you saying it's possible to have a direct out with the built-in cab sim and an amp out without the cab sim at the same time? And how do you say that you use a dual tone patch for this and then say it doesn't work for dual amp patches???
What I did is this:
I made a dual amp patch where one signal path has the FX and the amp model I want and the other path I left completely blank.
Then I panned each signal path in the mixer section 100% L and 100% R.
I connected my HD500 with two cables (L and R) into the L and R line inputs of my audio interface (Line 6 UX2), and in my DAW (Cubase) I routed the signal to two mono tracks on which I recorded simultaneously.
This way I got two tracks, one has the patch-signal and the other has the dry DI signal that I can use for re-amping or for a amp/cab sim.
For a 'real' dual amp patch (a patch where I use different amp models on each signal path) this won't work because you need one signal path to remain blank for the DI-signal.
JoshuaKaroshi
Karoshi
Id love to see someone nail the Architects tone! More specifically Early Grave.
You can hear it pretty clearly at 2:50.
You can hear it pretty clearly at 2:50.
Guys a slight problem, I have the new models but POD HD Edit doesn't seem to have registered them in its drop-down menus where you edit patches. Any thoughts? When I go through manually on the POD itself, while connected to Edit, the tone comes out right but in Edit it shows a blank.
Also, what are people's favourite djent patches? I am going to be writing a song in this much-maligned style and need something quick to sound the part.
Also, what are people's favourite djent patches? I am going to be writing a song in this much-maligned style and need something quick to sound the part.
MF_Kitten
Set up us the bomb
Shall have a look through, thought I'd got all the updates.
Paolosev91
Active Member
I'll repost here since I had no reply about it...
I am thinking that maybe the input2: variax works but actually sends an half signal to the pod! I am not a master in electronics but I think that there is a difference in dynamics between:
1) half signal (guitar+variax) + eq boost to achieve the same input level (meambobbo's method) and
2) full signal (guitar+same) without boost!
I happened to think this because of the pod signal routing:
if I want to play guitar and bass on the same patch, I have to divide the path with 2 amps.
Using regular routing (guitar+aux(bass)) I will have the same guitar level pushing my amp, so my path A amp reacts as it should.
Now here's POD scheme:
guit+variax amp in pre: low signal
guit+variax amp path A: normal signal
guit+same amp in pre: normal signal
guit+same amp path A: normal signal. (so that you can use 2 instruments or 2 amps being fed with the right guitar level)
That's why Line6 leaves "same" as default! I'm pretty sure that the pod was designed to be used in that way if you are using a single amp! (the amp in path A introduces a slight delay, that you can hear comparing patches as you play)
meambobbo said that there are phase problems in the doubled guitar signal, and I'm sure he can prove it. But I think that with "same" you only have a double amplitude signal hitting the amp in pre and not to signals interfering with each other and creating odd effects.
However, my analysis doesn't solve the clipping problems! You always have to reduce gain before some effects such as screamers, than boost it again... and you have to do it more often while using "same". But I think it leaves more dynamics and amp feel than the variax setting. Listen to any amp sample on youtube that provides knob settings, then recreate that sound with a signle amp in pre patch. You can achieve that sound immediately without boosting if you use the "input2: same" setting. that's how I think they designed the pod.
I am thinking that maybe the input2: variax works but actually sends an half signal to the pod! I am not a master in electronics but I think that there is a difference in dynamics between:
1) half signal (guitar+variax) + eq boost to achieve the same input level (meambobbo's method) and
2) full signal (guitar+same) without boost!
I happened to think this because of the pod signal routing:
if I want to play guitar and bass on the same patch, I have to divide the path with 2 amps.
Using regular routing (guitar+aux(bass)) I will have the same guitar level pushing my amp, so my path A amp reacts as it should.
Now here's POD scheme:
guit+variax amp in pre: low signal
guit+variax amp path A: normal signal
guit+same amp in pre: normal signal
guit+same amp path A: normal signal. (so that you can use 2 instruments or 2 amps being fed with the right guitar level)
That's why Line6 leaves "same" as default! I'm pretty sure that the pod was designed to be used in that way if you are using a single amp! (the amp in path A introduces a slight delay, that you can hear comparing patches as you play)
meambobbo said that there are phase problems in the doubled guitar signal, and I'm sure he can prove it. But I think that with "same" you only have a double amplitude signal hitting the amp in pre and not to signals interfering with each other and creating odd effects.
However, my analysis doesn't solve the clipping problems! You always have to reduce gain before some effects such as screamers, than boost it again... and you have to do it more often while using "same". But I think it leaves more dynamics and amp feel than the variax setting. Listen to any amp sample on youtube that provides knob settings, then recreate that sound with a signle amp in pre patch. You can achieve that sound immediately without boosting if you use the "input2: same" setting. that's how I think they designed the pod.
Leuchty
Previously CYBERSYN
Anyone have any problems with their FBV?
Patch B LED wont light up anymore.
Patch B LED wont light up anymore.
fadjar_rama
fadjar_rama
I agree.,.,.,.,.,that's solve the problem.
Stealthdjentstic
Banned
Holy shit, fuzz + doom model = fun as hell!
LolloBlaskhyrt
HD Pro abuser
Exactly
MF_Kitten
Set up us the bomb
DID I NOT FUCKING TELL YOU?!
try the Classic Distortion with gain on half, output on full, bass and treble on full, and the filter knob to taste, pushing the Doom amp model. Seriously!
Static
Well-Known Member
Hey guys, has anyone ever used the Boss Gt-8 as midi controller for the Pod HD Pro?
if its possible, how do i exactly go about doing it ?
thanks.
if its possible, how do i exactly go about doing it ?
thanks.
JoshuaKaroshi
Karoshi
Here is my take on the bass tone from the new Testament record. Blended my bass' P and J pickup.
Testament Bass Tone Pod HD Pro by SeaEater on SoundCloud - Create, record and share your sounds for free
If anyone is interested in the patch just PM me. I know its not perfect but I felt like I was getting pretty close.
PS: It sounds like shit through iPod headphones (Whats new), so use something else!
Testament Bass Tone Pod HD Pro by SeaEater on SoundCloud - Create, record and share your sounds for free
If anyone is interested in the patch just PM me. I know its not perfect but I felt like I was getting pretty close.
PS: It sounds like shit through iPod headphones (Whats new), so use something else!
Electric Wizard
it's my first day
This! This! Great saturated Laneyish, Matampish toanz to be had.DID I NOT FUCKING TELL YOU?!
try the Classic Distortion with gain on half, output on full, bass and treble on full, and the filter knob to taste, pushing the Doom amp model. Seriously!
Can any Pro users shed some light on this?
