Carrion Rocket
Banned
There's a lot more rigtalk in this site than I had originally thought.
This site may earn a commission from merchant links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
Interesting question. But as a half jew who owns all the Hannemans, and who's best friend is Jewish - he doesn't care at all about the S&Key or the H dagger or thr Imperial Eagle. Because he knows me, and knows I'm not racist - I just like Slayer. And that's all good.Man, I used to love Dime's Rebel Flag guitars back in the day. I was also a different person back then. I like to think I've grown a little.
I use something I call the "Best Friend Test". Cause it's what made me finally get rid of a big ol' Confederate Flag I used to have hanging up in my room. Imagine you have a guitar with a graffic, and you consider it your "favorite" guitar. Now imagine that your best friend is some race/ethnicity/nationality/whatever, and you bring them over to your house and show them your "favorite guitar". How do you think owning that guitar makes them feel? How would it make them feel about their "best friend" relationship with you? If you can see a serious problem popping up, maybe reconsider having that guitar. Like, I'm part Native American (Choctaw). If I meet a new friend, and go over to their house and their favorite guitar has something that looks like the old Cleveland Indians mascot all over it? I don't really care how long they lived in Cleveland, I'm gonna be super uncomfortable about one of their favorite things having a lame cartoonized version of my relatives on their guitar. I guess I'd imagine a jewish person might have the same reaction to "look at my guitar with SS inlays" or an African American person might view a guitar with a big ol' confederate flag. Would a jewish person view an Iron Cross the same way? I have no way of saying that for sure. I certainly don't associate it exclusively with the Nazi party as I've seen it used for all sorts of things, but I'm not in that culture. Who knows, maybe this would be something to reach out to a group and ask how they feel about it.
I briefly owned one of the later models with Eagle/H inlays. It looked cool and I loved the Kahler but I couldn't get a decent sound out of that specific guitar for the life of me. I'd be curious to try one of the newer models with star inlays, if they ever ship.
The only graphics that should be on a guitar are a 5A quilt maple top.
There’s a saying “not all skinfolk are kinfolk”. Im also reminded of posts elsewhere along the lines of “well im First Nations and this doesnt bother me” which strongly implies that person can speak for others of their background…Interesting question. But as a half jew who owns all the Hannemans, and who's best friend is Jewish - he doesn't care at all about the S&Key or the H dagger or thr Imperial Eagle. Because he knows me, and knows I'm not racist - I just like Slayer. And that's all good.
I think there's an interesting point here about not judging a book by its cover, and people are seldom black and white.
I'm a Roman Catholic and own the guitar below...Daemoness 'Conception of the AntiChrist'..which features a lot of 'religious' persecution from unfounded fear and paranoia which swept Europe for several centuries. The graphic on the back is taken from various publications of the infamous Malleus Maleficarum....a book which was responsible for deaths of countless thousands of innocent people in the Middle Ages. The question is does it offend the average person as opposed to Nazi Symbolism on a guitar? At what cut off point does history offend and then become okay? There's a lot of metal album covers you can fire into this argument as well. Do you totally wash over history...no matter how dark it may be? Does this history need to be on guitars? I dunno....it's a difficult subject for sure. Nobody alluded to this Daemoness being offensive when I posted it online before.
Rear of the Year 1486:
View attachment 136680
View attachment 136681
you look like a cringe edgelord with shit taste
I mean, a really simple answer to that might be when it's long enough ago to be just history and not a current problem. Nazi imagery is a big problem because we're still dealing with nazis. Since we're no longer in the middle ages, that graphic of satan's butthole isn't likely to rile up many witch hunters or whatever - anyone who recognizes the image (I didn't, I had to google it) understands it as a historical reference instead of a dogwhistle. When we're far enough removed from actual nazism, then sure, it can be taken as a historical collectors piece or an aesthetic. But we 'aint there yet.At what cut off point does history offend and then become okay?